Donald Trump faced the commencement of his historic New York criminal trial this Monday.

In a groundbreaking legal scenario, Trump is on trial facing 34 felony charges over allegations of falsifying business records to influence the 2016 election, and the prosecutor in the case is drawing serious criticism from radio and television personality Mark Levin, as The Blaze explains.

The trial opened with the initial phase of jury selection at a Manhattan courthouse, where Trump was present.

Understanding the Charges Against Former President Trump

At the core of the trial, accusations revolve around nondisclosure payments allegedly made to adult entertainer Stormy Daniels.

The legal and ethical categorization of the disbursements as either a business or a legal expense is pivotal to the case.

The controversy stems from the potential that this misclassification was intended to conceal the use of funds for purposes deemed illegal.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who is leading the prosecution, is fervently pursuing a conviction. His office argues that the categorization errors in the business records were deliberate, aiming to influence the 2016 election outcome by obscuring Trump's alleged actions.

Mark Levin's Firm Stance on Legal Proceedings

Conservative commentator Mark Levin has been vocal in criticizing the foundation of the trial. He argues that the trial focuses improperly on what he considers minor legal discrepancies related to a non-disclosure agreement, thereby inflating them to felony status. Levin's perspective is that these charges are politically motivated, crafted to secure a conviction in a politically biased jury setting.

"This is a reporting issue for the company that paid the nondisclosure agreement with Stormy Daniels," Levin explained. "The issue is whether it was a legal expense or business expense. So, Bragg says, 'Well it should have been in one category rather than the other and the reason it was in the wrong category is Trump was trying to cover up that he was using money this purpose.'"

Political Implications Echo Through the Legal Arguments

Levin further criticizes the role of the Manhattan D.A. in this matter, suggesting that the local jurisdiction should not be involved in what he views as a federal issue. "You might be asking yourself, what does a D.A. have to do with the federal? Nothing. That’s why this case should have been dismissed immediately," Levin stated.

His comments reflect a deep skepticism about the impartiality of the legal process, particularly concerning the jury's composition, which he claims will inevitably favor a conviction. "It’s not only bizarre, but he takes the precedent of a loss and applies it anyway. Why? 'Cause he’s going to have an all Democrat jury, and he knows they’ll convict Trump," Levin remarked.

Jury Selection Marks Beginning of Historic Trial

The trial is historic not only because of the defendant's previous role as President but also due to the nature of the charges and the intense public and political interest it has sparked. As the jury selection progresses, the legal strategies of both the defense and the prosecution will become clearer, potentially indicating the direction and tone the trial is likely to take over the coming weeks.

The proceedings are expected to draw extensive media coverage and public scrutiny, as they involve a former leader of the nation charged in a criminal case, an unprecedented event in American history.

Summary Of Key Trial Aspects

In conclusion, Donald Trump's trial involves serious allegations of falsifying business records to influence the 2016 election, with 34 felony charges against him.

The trial's focus is on the legality of a nondisclosure payment, intensely scrutinized by both legal experts and political commentators.

Conservative pundit Mark Levin strongly criticizes the legal and political foundations of the trial, suggesting that the charges are inflated and politically motivated.

The outcome of this trial may have far-reaching implications, both legally and politically, as it progresses.