DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

New York AG Claims Trump's $175M Bond Inadequately Supported, Seeks Its Rejection

 April 21, 2024

The Attorney General of New York, Letitia James, has moved to void a $175 million bond secured by former President Donald Trump, casting doubt on the insurer's ability to back such a substantial amount.

The legal maneuver aims to block the bond, questioning its adequacy amidst Trump’s simultaneous involvement in a separate criminal trial, as the Daily Mail reports.

On Friday, the New York Attorney General's Office submitted a 26-page filing requesting a judge to nullify the bond associated with a civil fraud case implicating Trump. The bond was posted as a safeguard pending the outcome of the lawsuit.

The office has expressed concerns over the lack of clear collateral backing the bond. They argue that the defendants, including Trump, have not demonstrated sufficient assets to justify the financial guarantee provided.

In response, the Attorney General's office has requested that Trump and other defendants secure an alternative bond within seven days following the court’s ruling on this matter.

Controversial Backing by Small Insurer

Trump’s choice of Knight Specialty Insurance Company (KSIC) for the bond has raised eyebrows due to its limited operating status in New York. KSIC is not regulated by New York's insurance department, which further complicates its acceptance as a surety.

KSIC's financials show a total policyholder surplus of just $138 million, a figure that falls short of the $175 million bond it has underwritten. This discrepancy has fueled the Attorney General's skepticism about the bond’s legitimacy.

The insurer’s involvement originated from Don Hankey, a California billionaire, who decided to support Trump by providing the bond through his company after media reports highlighted Trump’s struggles to secure a larger bond.

Scrutiny Over Insurer's Qualifications

The AG's office has criticized Knight Insurance’s qualifications as a surety, noting past federal law violations by its management. These infractions have cast doubts about the insurer's credibility and legal standing to undertake such significant financial commitments.

Trump’s legal difficulties in securing a higher bond of $464 million were disclosed during court proceedings. This larger amount was originally considered necessary to cover potential liabilities in the case.

Hankey’s intervention was described as a crucial response to Trump's inability to find a suitable guarantor, leading to the acceptance of a lower bond amount just as Trump's legal team faced increasing pressure.

Upcoming Court Hearing and Parallel Criminal Trial

The AG's office has set a deadline for a court hearing scheduled for Monday, which coincides with the commencement of Trump’s separate criminal trial regarding hush money payments. This simultaneous legal battle adds a layer of complexity to Trump’s ongoing legal challenges.

The legal stance taken by James' office was summarized in their argument that the bond, as it stands, is backed by insufficient collateral and should not be relied upon. They maintain that KSIC fails to meet the necessary standards to act as a surety.

In court documents, James' office firmly stated that Trump and KSIC have not fulfilled the requirement to justify the insurance company as a guarantor for this significantly large bond.

Final Plea and Conclusion

In conclusion, the New York Attorney General’s Office is pressing for the invalidation of a $175 million bond posted by Donald Trump, citing concerns over the financial stability and legal qualifications of the backing insurer, Knight Specialty Insurance Company.

This legal dispute not only questions the adequacy of the bond’s collateral but also underscores the broader implications for Trump's financial and legal standing amidst multiple ongoing trials.

As the court date approaches, both the legitimacy of the bond and the capacity of KSIC to fulfill its obligations remain under intense scrutiny, setting the stage for a pivotal legal ruling.