In a recent candid discussion, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson tackled concerns about the Supreme Court's perception and the essentiality of a code of ethics for justices.

In an interview with Stephen Colbert, Justice Jackson described her approach to maintaining judicial impartiality amidst growing public scrutiny, Fox News reported.

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson appeared on Stephen Colbert's late-night show this Tuesday, using the platform to promote her new memoir, "Lovely One," and to share her views on pressing issues facing the judiciary. Her participation marked an important moment in discussing judicial philosophy coupled with public perception of the court.

A Reflection on Judicial Influence and Personal Beliefs

During the interview, Justice Jackson reflected on her experiences working as a clerk for Justice Breyer, which profoundly shaped her judicial outlook. Her training and Breyer’s mentorship bolstered her confidence in separating personal views from judicial responsibilities, an essential aspect of her role on the bench.

Justice Jackson strongly emphasized the capability of all justices to remain unbiased in their duties. Her statement, made amidst audience laughter, underscored the widespread skepticism about judicial impartiality. She reaffirmed her commitment to this ideal, insisting on the separation of personal belief from legal interpretation.

Tackling Perceptions of Political Bias at the Supreme Court

Justice Jackson's remarks on judicial impartiality were particularly poignant given recent controversies surrounding the Supreme Court. She underscored the critical need for the public to trust that justices are beyond political influence, given the recent divisive rulings and the public debates they have ignited.

The justice's advocacy for an enforceable code of ethics highlights a move towards greater transparency and accountability within the highest court. Jackson is pushing for clearer guidelines on gift acceptance and ethical behavior to bolster public confidence in judicial impartiality.

The Importance of Historical Court Decisions

Last year, in another key interview with CBS News’ Norah O'Donnell, Justice Jackson criticized the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity, particularly concerning former President Trump. She raised concerns about the appearance of legal discrepancies that could undermine public trust in judicial equality.

Her critique extended to the broader implications of how justice is perceived in America, focusing on equal treatment under the law, irrespective of one's position or power. This stance is pivotal in her call for reforms that ensure every American believes in the fairness and integrity of the judicial process.

An Enforceable Code of Ethics as a Pillar of Trust

Building on her statements, Justice Jackson discussed the essential nature of adhering to strict ethical codes. In addition, she highlighted the necessity of judges being transparent about potential conflicts of interest, such as gift receptions, which might sway public opinion on their impartiality.

Moreover, “I follow the rules, whatever they are, with respect to ethical obligations. And it's important, in my view, to do so. It really boils down to impartiality. That's what the rules are about. People are entitled to know if you're accepting gifts as a judge so that they can evaluate whether or not your opinions are impartial,” Jackson confidently stated, advocating for rigorous ethical conduct among her peers.

Closing Remarks on Judicial Integrity

Justice Jackson ended her interview by reiterating her commitment to Justice Breyer's teachings about integrity and staying within the defined boundaries of judicial conduct. Consequently, these remarks solidified her dedication to practicing law with the utmost sincerity and respect for the judicial role.

Moreover, as the Supreme Court continues to confront complex issues that attract public and media attention, Justice Jackson's voice on maintaining judicial sanctity through ethical practice and impartiality stands out as a guiding beacon for current and future justices.