As Vice President Kamala Harris prepares for her first significant interview since her nomination, the decision to pre-record the session with CNN has sparked a wave of criticism from conservative circles and pro-Trump groups.

Vice President Kamala Harris's decision to conduct her first major post-nomination interview in a pre-recorded format on CNN has raised concerns about media bias and content manipulation, Breitbart reported.

Harris Chooses a Controlled Interview Setting

The interview, set to include her running mate, Governor Tim Walz, marks Harris's first formal media engagement since her presidential campaign began. They scheduled the interview for a pre-recorded airing, allowing edits before broadcast, which critics argue could be used to adjust the Vice President's responses.

Her last televised interview occurred over a month ago, with her most recent solo press conference dating back to December 2, 2023. This gap in unscripted appearances has fueled further speculation and criticism.

Critics Question CNN's Editorial Integrity

Mike Davis, the founder of the Article III Project, expressed his skepticism on Breitbart News, questioning whether CNN would maintain journalistic integrity or instead edit the content to favour Harris. His remarks underscored a perceived bias at CNN, particularly in its handling of political figures.

"Kamala Harris is having a campaign rally with her base at CNN, and they are even letting her pre-tape the interview," Davis commented, highlighting doubts about the forthcoming edits and the use of a teleprompter.

Conservative Figures and Media React

The Trump War Room's account on X (formerly Twitter) and other conservative commentators have openly mocked Harris's perceived reliance on scripted interactions. "LOL – Kamala can't even do an edited softball CNN interview without backup," tweeted "catturd2", a prominent conservative voice on X.

Amid these critiques, Steve Guest, a communications specialist, demanded that CNN release the unedited version of the interview to ensure transparency. "The entire interview needs to be released — unedited," he insisted.

The Role of Dana Bash as Interviewer

They selected Dana Bash, a senior CNN correspondent known for her political coverage, to conduct the interview. This choice has drawn particular attention due to Bash's previous remarks, which some have called biased against former President Trump and favorable to Democratic figures.

Ryan Saavedra, a senior reporter at the Daily Wire, pointed out, "Kamala Harris finally agrees to an interview, and she picks CNN's Dana Bash, who is one of the most biased people at the network. It appears that it will be pre-taped, likely edited to help her."

Public Speaking and Campaign Challenges

Since Harris announced her candidacy, people have scrutinized her public appearances for their content and delivery. Critics have targeted her speeches for unclear statements on core issues like democracy and economic policy, as well as for repetitive phrases such as "return on investment."

During a recent interaction with a Pennsylvania football team, she used the analogy, "You will be undefeated even if you don't win every game," which confused some audience members regarding its relevance and clarity.

Broader Implications for Media and Politics

The ongoing debate over the format of Harris's interview highlights broader concerns about media impartiality and the manipulation of political messaging in pre-recorded broadcasts. This incident has intensified discussions on the transparency and fairness of news media, particularly in the context of an election cycle.

As the interview date approaches, both Harris supporters and critics are keen to see how CNN handles the broadcast and whether the final product reflects the unedited dialogue or a polished version aligned with specific narratives.