DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Trump Campaign Challenges Nevada Over Alleged Noncitizen Voting

 September 16, 2024

The Trump campaign, alongside Nevada Republicans, has initiated legal action against the state of Nevada, claiming that noncitizens cast votes during the 2020 election and could do so again in the upcoming November election.

The lawsuit, which was filed by Trump and his allies in Carson City District Court, makes key charges about the integrity of Nevada's election system and demands increased protections against ineligible and fraudulent voters, as Newsmax reports.

The lawsuit seeks immediate action to prevent noncitizens from voting in future elections.

According to the complaint, the plaintiffs allege that up to 4,000 noncitizens participated in the 2020 general election. They also warn that a similar number could influence the upcoming November election unless further safeguards are implemented by the Secretary of State’s office.

Nevada Republicans Express Concern Over Election Integrity

Nevada GOP Chair Michael McDonald emphasized the gravity of the allegations in a news release. He stressed that the state’s election outcomes should only reflect the voices of its lawful citizens, free from any influence by those without legal standing to vote.

"Nevada's elections should be a reflection of its citizens' voices, not influenced by noncitizens who have no legal standing to participate," McDonald said, pointing to the potential risks posed by ineligible voters.

McDonald also warned that allowing noncitizens to vote could diminish the power of lawful Nevada voters, casting doubt over the integrity of future elections. He called on Nevada officials to prioritize the rights of citizens and ensure the election process remains protected.

Secretary of State Named in Lawsuit

The defendants listed in the lawsuit include Nevada Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar, the state Democratic Party, and the national Democratic Party. The Trump campaign and Nevada Republicans are specifically calling for the Secretary of State’s office to take additional steps to prevent any noncitizen voting from occurring in the future.

The plaintiffs argue that action from Aguilar’s office is essential to maintain trust in Nevada’s election system. They believe that despite existing election laws, noncitizen voting remains a threat, and further steps are necessary to address the issue before November.

Secretary of State’s Office Responds to Allegations

In response to the lawsuit, the Secretary of State’s office released a statement defending Nevada’s election procedures and the safeguards already in place. According to the office, the current measures are more than sufficient to prevent ineligible voters, including non-citizens, from participating in elections.

"Any claims of a widespread problem are false and only create distrust in our elections," the statement read. "The Secretary of State's Office is focused on running successful, safe, and fair elections on behalf of the voters."

The office maintained that while the Trump campaign and Nevada Republicans are raising concerns, there is no evidence of widespread noncitizen voting in Nevada. Officials reiterated their commitment to ensuring that all eligible voters can cast their ballots without fear of interference or fraud.

Legal Action Comes Amid Growing Election Tensions

This lawsuit is part of a broader trend of election-related legal challenges across the United States, many of which stem from claims of voter fraud and election irregularities following the 2020 presidential election. Supporters of the lawsuit argue that noncitizen voting could impact future election results, while critics claim the allegations are largely unfounded and are designed to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the election system.

The timing of this lawsuit, as the November elections approach, has intensified political tensions in Nevada, a key battleground state. With high stakes in both local and national races, the integrity of Nevada’s voting system is under increased scrutiny from both sides of the political aisle.

Concerns Over Noncitizen Voting Highlight Broader National Debate

The legal action in Nevada is also reflective of a broader national debate about election security, voter eligibility, and the role of state officials in ensuring fair elections. The issue of noncitizen voting has been a hot-button topic in recent years, with some states enacting stricter voter ID laws to prevent ineligible voters from casting ballots.

In Nevada, the Trump campaign and Nevada Republicans are pushing for similar measures, urging the court to mandate stricter enforcement of voter eligibility requirements. They argue that without additional safeguards, the state's election system could remain vulnerable to manipulation by noncitizens.

Next Steps in Lawsuit

As the lawsuit progresses through the court system, it remains to be seen what actions, if any, will be taken by Nevada officials in response. The plaintiffs are calling for immediate intervention to prevent noncitizen voting, while state officials assert that the necessary protections are already in place.

With the November elections just around the corner, the outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for how Nevada handles future elections. Both sides are preparing for a legal battle that may ultimately determine how the state approaches voter eligibility and election security moving forward.

Potential Impact on Future Elections

If the court sides with the Trump campaign and Nevada Republicans, it could lead to stricter enforcement of voter ID laws and other measures designed to prevent noncitizen voting. On the other hand, if the court rules in favor of the state, it could reaffirm the existing safeguards as sufficient to protect election integrity.

In either case, the lawsuit has drawn attention to the ongoing debate over election security, with both sides claiming to defend the rights of voters. The resolution of this case could set a precedent for how similar challenges are addressed in other states in the future.