We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

'Absolutely Not': Rep. Chip Roy Denounces Senate Proposal for Women's Draft Registration

 June 15, 2024

Controversy has intensified surrounding the inclusion of a provision in the proposed National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2025 requiring women to register for Selective Service intensifies political debates.

The Senate's endorsement of the NDAA amendment that mandates female registration with Selective Service has ignited significant opposition, notably from GOP Representative Chip Roy of Texas, as The Blaze reports.

The 2025 fiscal NDAA, currently advancing through the U.S. legislative process, now includes a transformative amendment. This amendment seeks to change the Military Selective Service Act, expanding the registration requirement that has historically applied only to males.

As of now, U.S. law mandates that all male citizens and male immigrants, between the ages of 18 and 25, register with the Selective Service. This registration is a precautionary measure, allowing for a speedy draft in times of national emergency.

The change proposed by the Senate would extend these obligations to females, a move that has brought the issue of gender equality in military service to the forefront of national discourse.

Senate Committee Pushes NDAA Forward

The Senate Committee on Armed Services recently voted with a significant majority, 22-3, to bring the NDAA to the Senate floor. This decision marks a pivotal step in the legislative journey of the 2025 NDAA.

The Committee's executive summary explicitly states the intent behind the amendment: making registration for Selective Service a requirement for both men and women, equalizing the responsibilities among U.S. residents. This adjustment to the Selective Service Act is viewed by some as a stride towards gender equality, but it remains a contentious issue among others who perceive it as an unnecessary or undesirable shift.

House Declares its Stance

Parallel to the Senate's actions, the House of Representatives passed its version of the NDAA. The lower chamber's take similarly involves a significant stance on the Selective Service -- automatic registration for men.

The House-approved version of the NDAA explicitly calls for the automatic registration of every eligible male citizen and resident within the age bracket set by existing laws. This automatic registration process aims to streamline administrative procedures and ensure compliance with the law, reinforcing the infrastructure needed in case a draft becomes a necessity.

Rep. Chip Roy's Vociferous Opposition

The amendment to include women in the Selective Service registration has not been met without resistance. Prominent amongst the voices of opposition is Republican Representative Chip Roy of Texas.

Despite supporting the overall NDAA in the House, where it won the backing of 211 House Republicans, Roy was explicit in his condemnation of the gender inclusivity amendment added by the Senate. In a starkly heated comment, Roy stated, "You can go straight to hell. Over my dead body," signaling his staunch opposition to the proposed changes.

Implications of the Proposed Amendment

The unfolding debate over the NDAA and its Selective Service provision casts a spotlight on broader issues of equality and military readiness. Proponents argue that including women in Selective Service could broaden the pool of potential recruits in dire times and promote fairness in civic duties.

Opponents like Roy, however, view it as an overreach and unnecessary disturbance to the status quo, which could complicate the existing systems without significant benefit.

The fate of this amendment will depend on the broader legislative process and whether both houses of Congress can reconcile their versions of the NDAA into a single, passable bill.

Analysis of Congressional Dynamics and Public Sentiment

The diverse reactions within both chambers of Congress reflect the complex dynamics that characterize contemporary legislative processes in the United States. These developments provide a clear view of the contrasting philosophies that influence American politics.

The public’s reaction mirrors this divide, with vocal support for increased gender inclusivity in some quarters and fervent opposition in others. This legislative move will undoubtedly be a significant factor in ongoing debates about the role of women in the military and by extension, in other areas of civic duty.

As the NDAA continues its journey through the legislative process, the nation watches closely, aware that the outcomes could impact U.S. military and societal structures for years to come.

Conclusion: A Nation at a Crossroads

In conclusion, the amendment to the Military Selective Service Act within the NDAA for fiscal year 2025, requiring women to register alongside men, represents a pivotal moment in U.S. legislative history.

This issue encapsulates a broader debate regarding gender roles and equality, the practical implications of military readiness, and the philosophical underpinnings of compulsory service. As Congress continues to hash out the details, the nation remains engaged, waiting to see the path it will take.