Judge Aileen Cannon, whose decision to dismiss Donald Trump's classified documents case drew significant attention earlier this year, is reportedly under consideration to become attorney general if the former president secures a second term.

The reported consideration by Trump of Cannon for the AG role comes after her dismissal of the documents case on the grounds that special counsel Jack Smith's appointment was unconstitutional from the start, as Newsmax reports.

Appointed by Trump to the federal bench in 2020, Cannon dismissed the case involving classified documents against the former president on July 15.

The dismissal was based on her finding that the appointment of Smith by Attorney General Merrick Garland as special counsel was unconstitutional. The case at issue involved 40 federal charges to which Trump pleaded not guilty.

Potential Nominees Revealed

Cannon's potential appointment was apparently noted in a document entitled "Transition Planning: Legal Principals," according to an ABC News report.

Her name is second on a list of candidates for the attorney general role, following that of Jay Clayton, former chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Trump advisor Boris Epshteyn is said to have contributed insights for preparing this document.

Other individuals under consideration for key legal positions include attorneys Todd Blanche and Stanley Woodward. These considerations reflect Trump's evolving strategy for assembling a legal team if he wins the upcoming presidential election.

This recent revelation about Cannon's place on the list follows her notable court decisions. Her ruling to dismiss the classified documents case made waves in legal and political circles, potentially influencing Trump's consideration of her for an administration role.

Reactions and Strategic Moves in Legal Circles

The prospect of Cannon becoming U.S. attorney general adds complexity to the legal landscape surrounding Trump's potential reelection.

The response from parties involved remains cautious. A spokesperson for the special counsel's office refrained from commenting on the possible judicial appointments, according to ABC News.

This silence leaves room for speculation about the implications of these potential selections.

Observers note that Cannon's judicial actions have bolstered her profile among Trump's allies. Her adjudication of the classified documents case, despite controversy, aligns with the opinions of several key figures within Trump's sphere of influence.

Trump's Legal Team Plans Amid Election

As Trump prepares for the election, assembling a slate of dependable legal advisors seems to be a priority. The creation of the "Transition Planning: Legal Principals" document underscores this commitment to building a strategic legal team.

These developments are emerging as Trump positions himself for a potential return to the presidency. The selection process for key legal appointments remains fluid, influenced by ongoing legal disputes and political dynamics.

The inclusion of judges like Cannon on pivotal lists hints at the former president's approach to prioritizing loyalty and legal strategy. This focus on familiar figures emphasizes the role of trusted allies in shaping policy and legal approaches in Trump's prospective administration.

Potential Implications for Future Administration

As the details unfold, the legal community is watching closely to see how these proposed appointments could shape the landscape. Trump's strategies offer insights into how legal roles might be filled based on past interactions and judgments.

Whether Cannon's candidacy will advance remains uncertain, and it is likely contingent on numerous variables including judicial interpretation and political calculations. The list marks a significant element in Trump's broader administrative planning for potential re-election success.

Meanwhile, the scrutiny facing these potential appointees reflects the ongoing intersection of law and politics. Prospective roles in the Trump administration will likely continue to be evaluated against the backdrop of existing legal and political conditions.