We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Alvin Bragg Accused Of Discriminatory Hiring Practices In New Legal Complaint

 June 27, 2024

A complaint against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg alleges discriminatory conduct in hiring practices.

Bragg is under scrutiny as a complaint lodged by America First Legal (AFL) claims that his diversity-inspired hiring policies unfairly exclude straight, white men, and this action adds another layer to the ongoing controversies surrounding the D.A., who recently handled the prosecution of former President Donald Trump, as the Daily Mail reports.

The grievance, submitted to New York's Attorney Grievance Committee by AFL -- a group formed by former Trump administration officials -- challenges the legality of Bragg's office policies. It asserts that these policies give undue preference to women and LGBTQ or ethnic minorities over white male candidates.

Details Behind the Diversity Hiring Complaint

The complaint references materials from the Manhattan D.A.'s office, including their website and internal documents that emphasize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).

Specifics from the application process for law clerks in Bragg's office were cited, highlighting that applicants are prompted to disclose their race, ethnicity, gender, and LGBT status.

However, these forms notably lack an option for applicants to identify as 'straight' or 'heterosexual', which has raised concerns about potential discrimination against this group. The AFL has taken this issue beyond the state level, also filing complaints with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the New York Department of Labor.

As the review process of the grievance committee is confidential, they have refrained from commenting on the ongoing matter. Meanwhile, Bragg's office has not yet responded to requests for comments on these allegations.

Recent Legal Actions and Public Criticism

Alongside the current complaint, AFL has been active in challenging DEI policies at various institutions, particularly after the Supreme Court's decision against affirmative action in college admissions in June 2023.

Their actions reflect a broader criticism of what they perceive as an overreach in diversity policies affecting numerous sectors.

Bragg's recent actions, especially his prosecutorial decisions in high-profile cases like that of Donald Trump, have ignited debates on his approach to criminal justice.

Critics argue that his policies, which often reduce felony charges to misdemeanors, are too lenient and compromise public safety.

Despite these criticisms, statistics indicate that crime rates in New York City have seen a slight decrease compared to the period before the pandemic. This suggests a complex interplay between prosecutorial policies and their impact on urban safety.

Broader Implications of the Complaint

Statements from AFL emphasize the gravity of the allegations. Dan Epstein, AFL’s vice president, remarked, “Bragg’s office appeared to have unlawfully discriminated against employment applicants to his office by using race or sex as a factor in hiring.” He further insisted on strict legal compliance in law enforcement roles.

Adding to the fray, Alex Pfeiffer, a spokesman for Make America Great Again Inc., voiced a strong rebuke, saying, “Alvin Bragg is a disgrace. He cares more about targeting Joe Biden’s political opponent than protecting New Yorkers from rapists, murderers, and robbers.” This reflects a wider sentiment among critics who disapprove of Bragg's prosecutorial priorities.

As the case unfolds, the legal and public scrutiny of Bragg’s office continues to intensify, bringing into question the balance between diversity initiatives and equitable hiring practices in government roles.

Conclusion and Reflections on Diversity Hiring

This allegations against D.A. Alvin Bragg have brought to light critical issues regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion policies in hiring.

As AFL extends its legal challenges to various DEI initiatives, the outcomes of these complaints could set precedents affecting the implementation of such policies across the board.

The controversy envelops not only the legal ramifications but also the ethical considerations of fairness in employment practices in today’s political and social climate.