We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Arizona Court Reverses $27K Penalty Against GOP Over 2020 Election Case

 May 6, 2024

A pivotal legal victory for the Arizona GOP has overturned financial sanctions related to challenges of 2020 election audit procedures.

The Arizona Supreme Court has overruled a lower court decision that had previously imposed a $27,000 fine on the Arizona Republican Party for its legal actions regarding the 2020 election results in Maricopa County, as the Washington Examiner reports.

Origins of the Legal Battle

The saga began when the Arizona Republican Party contested the outcome of the 2020 presidential election in Maricopa County. They specifically challenged the county's mandatory hand-count audit process, arguing it was improperly executed.

The party's contention was based on the audit's use of sample votes from vote centers that served all county voters instead of focusing on precinct-specific results.

This, officials argued, skewed the audit's representation of the voting results.

Despite these claims, subsequent tests of the election machinery found the vote counts to be 100% accurate, affirming the integrity of the results presented.

The Court's Rulings Through Time

In response to the GOP's legal challenge, Judge John Hannah in 2021 labeled the lawsuit as "meritless." He ordered the state Republican Party to compensate the Secretary of State’s office for $18,000 in legal fees incurred during the defense.

This decision was later upheld by an Arizona appeals court in 2023, which further added $9,000 in sanctions against the GOP, totaling $27,000. The case then progressed to the Arizona Supreme Court for further review.

Justice John Lopez of the majority-Republican Arizona Supreme Court noted that the attorney fees award was not warranted since the GOP's challenge was not without foundation.

Implications of the Supreme Court Decision

The state Supreme Court’s decision has been hailed by the Republican Party as a confirmation of its right to challenge election laws through the judicial system. GOP officials viewed the court's ruling as a validation of their concerns regarding election law interpretations.

"We hold that the attorney fees award was improper because Petitioners’ claim was not groundless, thus obviating any need to determine whether the claim was made in the absence of good faith," wrote Justice Lopez, elucidating the court's rationale.

The state GOP, in a formal statement, underscored the decision as reinforcing a fundamental legal principle, stating, "The ruling reaffirms the fundamental legal principle that raising questions about the interpretation and application of election laws is a legitimate use of the judicial system, not a groundless or bad faith action."

Context of the 2020 Presidential Election

The lawsuit was among over 60 legal actions nationally challenging the victory of President Joe Biden over former President Donald Trump. Notably, Biden secured Arizona by a narrow margin of 10,457 votes, equivalent to 0.3% of the total vote.

This margin marked the first Democratic victory in Arizona since Bill Clinton won the state in 1996, highlighting its significance in the broader national political landscape.

The GOP's legal maneuvers in Arizona were part of a broader array of election-related challenges that surfaced across the United States following the 2020 election.


In conclusion, the Arizona Supreme Court's decision to reverse the sanctions against the Arizona Republican Party marks a significant moment in the post-2020 election period.

This ruling not only impacts the state GOP financially but also sets a precedent regarding the legitimacy of judicial challenges to election processes.

The court's reversal underscores the complexity of election law and the importance of judicial oversight in maintaining the integrity of the electoral process.