We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Attorney General Merrick Garland Faces Congressional Contempt Over Withheld Biden Interview Audio

 May 7, 2024

Amidst escalating tensions between Congress and the Department of Justice, Republicans are moving to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt for not releasing audio recordings of President Joe Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur, Daily Mail reported.

The controversy centers on the DOJ's refusal to provide Congress with audio tapes from an interview concerning Biden's handling of classified documents.

Attorney General Merrick Garland was given until April 8 to submit all pertinent materials from Special Counsel Robert Hur’s interviews with President Biden. While the DOJ complied by providing transcripts and some recordings, they withheld the specific audio from Hur's sessions with Biden.

Garland Misses Deadline, Congress Moves Towards Contempt Charge

The withholding led to the House Judiciary Committee planning a markup on May 16 to proceed with contempt charges against Garland, almost a month after the initial deadline had passed.

The DOJ has argued that releasing the requested audio recordings could jeopardize future cooperation in similar investigations. They believe that future witnesses might be deterred from fully cooperating with prosecutors if such sensitive materials are made readily available to Congress.

Oversight Chairman James Comer has expressed strong opposition to the Biden Administration's stance, asserting that it is not the administration's place to decide what Congress requires for effective oversight.

Special Counsel's Assessment of Biden Draws Attention

Special Counsel Robert Hur, in his report, described President Biden as a "sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory." Despite noting Biden's casual approach to handling classified documents—a potential national security risk—Hur ultimately decided against pressing charges.

This decision was influenced by Biden's apparent forgetfulness during interviews, which Hur believed would make him appear as a forgetful elderly man if brought to court.

In testimony, Hur emphasized the need to be transparent about his reasons for not filing charges, citing the necessity to "show his work" to maintain the credibility of his decision.

Details from the Interview Highlight Biden's Memory Issues

During his October 2023 interviews, Biden often struggled to remember significant personal and historical dates. For instance, he needed reminders from his lawyer about the date of his son Beau's death and when Donald Trump was elected President.

Transcripts reveal Biden occasionally joking about the investigation, including a lighthearted comment about finding potentially embarrassing photos of his wife.

"What month did Beau die?" Biden asked during the interview before being reminded by his lawyer, "Oh God, May 30th."

DOJ Defends Decision to Withhold Audio

Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte pointed out that Congress had already been provided with "extraordinary accommodation" through the release of the transcripts, which he claimed contained all necessary information.

A letter from the DOJ further stated, "To go further by producing the audio files would compound the likelihood that future prosecutors will be unable to secure this level of cooperation. It is clearly not in the public interest to render such cooperation with prosecutors and investigators less likely in the future."

This stance has been met with criticism from congressional leaders who insist on full access to all investigative materials to fulfill their oversight responsibilities.

Political and Legal Implications of DOJ's Decision

The impending contempt charges against Garland highlight a significant clash between Congressional oversight responsibilities and the executive branch's control over sensitive information.

This confrontation raises questions about the balance of power and the transparency required in handling national security issues.

The situation remains dynamic, with potential legal and political ramifications depending on the outcomes of the scheduled congressional proceedings.

Conclusion: Summarizing the Contempt Proceedings Against Garland

Republicans are set to mark up contempt charges against AG Garland for failing to hand over the full audio from Biden's interview with Special Counsel Hur, citing the necessity of these materials for comprehensive congressional oversight. The DOJ's refusal, based on concerns about compromising future witness cooperation, has sparked a significant dispute on the oversight powers of Congress versus the confidentiality interests of the executive branch.

Despite the potential legal ramifications, the Department of Justice maintains that the release of the audio could undermine the integrity of future investigations. This argument hinges on the assumption that witnesses and involved parties might be less willing to engage openly if they fear their contributions could become public without their consent.

Biden's Humor Amidst Serious Investigations

Amidst these serious discussions about legal implications and memory issues, a lighter moment emerged during the interviews. President Biden joked about the investigators possibly finding "risqué pictures of my wife in a bathing suit. Which you probably did. She’s beautiful," showcasing his attempt to bring humor to the situation.

This humorous aside serves to humanize the President, presenting a contrast to the grave issues at stake. It also reflects his attempt to lighten the atmosphere during what was likely a tense interview process.

However, such moments do little to alleviate the concerns of those in Congress who argue that full transparency is necessary for effective governance and oversight.

Controversial Handling of Classified Documents

The core of the issue remains Biden’s handling of classified documents. Special Counsel Hur’s description of Biden as a national security risk due to his casual approach to document security underscores the gravity of the situation.

Despite this, Hur’s decision not to charge Biden was based on his judgment that a jury would likely be sympathetic to Biden, given his age and memory issues, which were evident during his interviews.

This aspect of the investigation has led to divided opinions on whether justice is being served or if political considerations are overshadowing legal standards.

Looking Ahead: Implications for Garland and Biden

As the date for the markup of contempt charges approaches, the political and legal landscapes are bracing for the impact. This case could set precedents for how similar situations are handled in the future, particularly concerning the transparency of high-level interviews and the balancing of public interest with operational security.

The decision to withhold the audio recordings will continue to be a focal point of discussions about executive accountability and congressional oversight capabilities.

The outcome of the May 16 proceedings will likely influence future interactions between Congress and the executive branch, potentially reshaping the dynamics of American political processes.

Conclusion: A Critical Moment for Executive Accountability

The standoff over the audio recordings from President Biden’s interview encapsulates broader issues of transparency, executive privilege, and the checks and balances system that defines U.S. governance. As both sides prepare for the upcoming congressional hearing, the nation watches closely to see how this dispute will affect the principles of oversight and executive accountability.