DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Biden Allies Urge Amnesty For Migrants As Election Looms, Fearing Trump's Return

 June 12, 2024

As the U.S. election draws near, investors who were instrumental in electing President Joe Biden are now pushing for a significant amnesty measure targeting around 1 million illegal migrants amid growing public resistance to immigration.

Amid rising concerns over potential electoral defeat, pro-migration advocates see this push for amnesty as a desperate but necessary move, as Breitbart reports.

This advocacy comes at a time when public opinion is increasingly against migration, especially low-wage or cheap-labor immigration, which many believe undercuts American workers and their wages.

Kevin Lynn, founder of U.S. Tech Workers, highlighted the stakes involved, noting that a re-election of Donald Trump could lead to sweeping deportations, driven by what he perceives as the failure of Biden's immigration policies.

Proposed Amnesty Mirrors Obama's DACA

The proposed amnesty would offer "immigration parole" to the undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens, granting them work permits and temporary residency rights. This move mirrors the controversial DACA program initiated by President Obama, which, despite its legal challenges, has not been fully rescinded.

However, the legality of such a sweeping use of the Department of Homeland Security’s authority has been called into question. Critics argue that it might exceed the department's mandate.

Simultaneously, a coalition of states has petitioned a federal judge to overturn another Biden policy projected to admit an additional 350,000 foreign workers annually.

FWD.us Champions New Amnesty Push

FWD.us, a lobbying organization founded by Mark Zuckerberg, is aggressively promoting amnesty. Todd Schulte, the president of FWD.us, contends that the amnesty could diminish xenophobia and support immigrant communities.

Schulte emphasizes that such policies not only embody American values but are crucial for building a modern and fair immigration system that supports the nation's needs and values.

This push for amnesty, however, is not without its detractors. The Immigration Accountability Project has labeled it outright as "AMNESTY," urging media outlets to report honestly on the implications.

Legal Concerns and Political Ramifications

Legal expert Andrew Arthur has voiced strong objections to the proposal, suggesting it is at best "legally questionable" and could pave the way for further similar actions if not checked. This would significantly alter the scope of the Department of Homeland Security's capabilities.

Kevin Lynn's remarks underscore the political tension surrounding this issue, describing the pro-migration narrative as collapsing and accusing Biden's camp of doubling down on failed strategies. He warns that this move could galvanize diverse Democratic activists to focus solely on immigration, sidelining other progressive priorities.

Lynn further cautions that introducing such a controversial policy late in an election cycle could pose significant electoral risks for Biden, describing the potential political fallout as "insane."

The Broader Impact of Immigration Policy

President Biden has indicated that progressive changes to immigration policies are on the horizon. These would potentially protect undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens from deportation and help them secure work permits and a path to citizenship.

The proposal's implications are far-reaching, affecting not only the immigrants involved but also the broader political landscape as the U.S. approaches another electoral showdown.

Schulte has highlighted the historical and ongoing importance of immigration policies like DACA, which he regards as a significant political achievement and a template for future policies.

In conclusion, as the election nears, the debate over this proposed amnesty is intensifying, framed by a complex interplay of legal challenges, political strategies, and the broader discourse on America’s immigration policy.

Proponents view it as a necessary step towards a more inclusive and fair society, while opponents decry it as an overreach of executive power with significant long-term consequences for the country's governance and electoral dynamics.