We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Chip Roy Urges Kamala Harris To Use 25th Amendment To Replace Biden

 June 29, 2024
In a bold political move, Rep. Chip Roy of Texas has initiated a resolution targeting President Joe Biden's capability to govern.
Rep. Roy's resolution requests Vice President Kamala Harris to consider the 25th Amendment in response to Biden's recent debate performance, The Daily Signal reported.The Texas Republican introduced the resolution after critics and supporters noted President Biden's faltering debate performance, including struggles like a raspy voice and verbal missteps.

Additionally, Vice President Harris has supported Biden, citing his strong debate finish as proof of his commitment to factual discourse.

Subsequently, questions about Biden's fitness for office were raised by his debate performance, sparking discussions on the implications of the 25th Amendment.

Exploring the Legal Basis for the 25th Amendment

The 25th Amendment, ratified in 1967, outlines processes for addressing presidential incapacity, enabling the Vice President, with a majority of the Cabinet, to declare a president unfit for presidential duties.

Roy's resolution suggests that Vice President Harris should temporarily assume presidential duties if the Amendment is invoked.

Moreover, this legislative tool is rarely publicly and directly considered, highlighting the gravity of Roy's concerns about Biden's fitness to serve.

Response From Both Sides of the Aisle

Democratic figures have largely defended Biden, with Vice President Harris emphasizing his integrity and commitment to truth, contrasting them with Donald Trump's debate tactics.

In contrast, Republican Senators like Mike Lee and Rick Scott have echoed Roy's concerns. Scott noted that Democrats are seriously considering the 25th Amendment, highlighting bipartisan unease about Biden's current capacity.

Meanwhile, former Senator Claire McCaskill criticized Biden for his inability to reassure the public about his presidential capability during the debate.

Implications for National Security and Governance

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna emphasized the stakes, describing the situation as a national security concern and urging the Attorney General to release specific recordings for more transparency from the administration.

Furthermore, the resolution and surrounding discourse underscore a deep divide in perceptions of Biden's presidential capacity, influencing his administration's stability and the broader national security landscape.

Luna's comments reflect the broader Republican narrative on governance transparency and presidential fitness, which she considers critical to national security.

Public and Political Reactions Continue to Unfold

The public's reaction to Roy's resolution and the broader discussion about the 25th Amendment is mixed, reflecting the polarized political climate in the United States.

As discussions continue, both in Congress and among the public, the debate over Biden's fitness for office is likely to persist, influencing political strategies as the next election cycle approaches.

Controversially, the resolution marks a significant moment in U.S. political history, highlighting the Constitution's mechanisms designed to safeguard effective national leadership.

Looking Forward: The Path Ahead for Biden and Harris

Chip Roy's resolution opens a complex chapter in American politics, potentially affecting both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in the long term.

The ongoing debate over presidential fitness highlights challenges for Biden's administration amid domestic and international pressures, regardless of whether the 25th Amendment is invoked.

The outcome of this challenge could define the remainder of Biden's term and influence the role of the vice presidency under Kamala Harris.

In conclusion, Rep. Chip Roy’s resolution ignites nationwide discussions about presidential capability and constitutional mechanisms like the 25th Amendment. Vice President Harris’s response, along with reactions from Democrats and Republicans, shapes a complex narrative about leadership, governance, and national security in the U.S.