DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

CNN Anchor Criticizes Harris Campaign Over Media Appearances

 October 17, 2024

An exchange of words between Vice President Kamala Harris' campaign and former President Donald Trump over their respective approaches to media interactions has grabbed attention in recent days.

CNN anchor Boris Sanchez questioned Harris campaign spokesman Ian Sams about the VP's decision to decline several interview opportunities while Sams highlighted Harris’ upcoming challenging media appearance with Bret Baier, as Fox News reports, diagnosing her as willing to engage in what Democrats perceive as a hostile environment.

On Tuesday, Sams took to Twitter to call out Trump for canceling another interview with a mainstream media outlet, namely, CBS. Sams alleged that Trump's avoidance of such interviews was due to scrutiny over his mental acuity, referencing a previous instance involving 60 Minutes.

The same day, CNN anchor Sanchez engaged Sams regarding the vice president's own media engagements. During this on-air discussion, Sanchez pressed Sams on Harris’ pattern of declining interviews and whether this mirrored the narrative used against Trump. Sanchez questioned, "Declining media hits really isn’t an indicator of mental fitness, is it?"

Harris Campaign Defends Against Criticism

In response, Sams defended Harris, emphasizing her commitment to facing difficult questions. He highlighted her slated interview with Baier on Fox News, arguing it as evidence of Harris’ willingness to engage with challenging media outlets. Sams stated that anyone doubting the vice president's readiness for tough questions should watch her interview, which took place on Wednesday.

Simultaneously, Sams pointed out the infrequent appearances of Trump on mainstream media, presenting a recent event at the Economic Club of Chicago moderated by Bloomberg as his first significant such engagement in over a month. This served as a counterbalance to the critique about Harris, suggesting both political figures had their share of selective media interactions.

High-Profile Interviews and Declines

Adding another angle to the story, John Micklethwait, editor-in-chief of Bloomberg News, informed viewers that Harris had declined an invitation to appear at the Economic Club.

During this interview at the Bloomberg event, Trump challenged Micklethwait on the topic of tariffs, asserting his belief in their positive impact, something that ran counter to the moderator's assertions. The event was characterized by intense exchanges, with Trump's comments indicating the heated nature of the dialogue.

Scheduled Fox News Interview

Meanwhile, preparations were underway for Harris' anticipated interview on Fox News' Special Report which aired Wednesday. The interview was poised to cover various pressing issues and was said by Sams to exemplify Harris' openness to discussing rigorous topics in a media setting known for its tough questioning.

Sams further asserted that for undecided voters, the upcoming media engagements by both figures are pivotal in shaping their decision-making process. He hinted that the few remaining undecided individuals were keenly observing which candidate could propose effective solutions for their concerns.

The Broader Media Interaction Discussions

These mutual criticisms over media engagement practices between rival political figures spotlight the intricate dynamics of campaign strategies. As political campaigns often seek to manage their media exposure carefully, the lines between strategy and evasion can often become subjects of public debate.

This development is part of a broader narrative in political communications where politicians balance public appearances with maintaining a controlled message, amid critics eager to seize on perceived inconsistencies or weaknesses.

As the landscape evolves, further interactions between Harris, Trump, and the media continue to be closely observed, with each side aiming to gain a strategic advantage in the eyes of the voting public.