DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Court Drops Chargest Against Two Officers in Breonna Taylor Case, Blames Boyfriend for Death

 August 26, 2024
In a ruling that upends previous narratives, a U.S. District Judge has significantly altered the course of the legal proceedings surrounding Breonna Taylor's tragic shooting.

Judge Charles Simpson cleared two former Louisville police officers of felony charges in the fatal shooting of Breonna Taylor, pointing to her boyfriend's actions instead of a flawed warrant as the cause of her death, a move sure to be celebrated by those who join former President Trump in their support of law enforcement, as Fox News reports.

The decision came after extensive review and consideration of the circumstances leading to Taylor's death, with Judge Charles Simpson presiding over the case.

Initially, the charges against Jaynes and Meany included "deprivation of rights under the color of law," a serious federal offense.

Initial Federal Charges and Subsequent Legal Developments

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland first announced these charges in August 2022. The spotlight on these officers stemmed from their role in securing the warrant used to enter Taylor’s Louisville apartment in March 2020, which tragically ended in her death during the raid.

Kenneth Walker, Taylor’s boyfriend, fired a shot upon the officers' entry, which he claimed was in self-defense, not knowing they were police. This action, according to the court's recent ruling, justified the officers' return fire which unfortunately resulted in Taylor’s death.

The court's decision was greatly influenced by the judge's assessment that the critical causal factor was the initial gunshot fired by Walker, not the debated legality of the warrant.

Legal Outcome and Reduced Charges

In light of these findings, the charges against Jaynes and Meany were reduced from potential life sentences to misdemeanors. Jaynes remains accused under a conspiracy charge, while Meany is still facing allegations of lying to FBI investigators during the inquiry into the raid.

Another twist in the case is the involvement of former officer Kelly Goodlett, who pleaded guilty to a conspiracy related to falsifying warrant information, which claimed a suspected drug dealer was receiving packages at Taylor’s apartment -- a claim later acknowledged as inaccurate.

The reduced charges and focus on Walker's actions represent a significant development in the case, which has garnered national attention and sparked widespread protests akin to those following George Floyd's death.

Taylor’s Family and Community Reaction

In a heartfelt statement, Breonna Taylor's family expressed profound devastation over the ruling, disagreeing with the justification of Taylor’s death. They indicated that the government plans to appeal the decision, reflecting ongoing legal battles and community discontent surrounding the case.

The reaction stretches beyond the courtroom, with the public and legal commentators parsing the details and implications of the judge's decision.

Taylor's family had previously settled lawsuits with the city of Louisville, receiving a $2 million settlement in December 2022, yet their quest for justice extends beyond financial compensation.

This legal rollercoaster continues to evoke strong emotions and debates over law enforcement practices, judicial interpretations, and the quest for systemic reforms in policing.

Broader Legal Context and Next Stages

While Jaynes and Meany face lesser charges, another former officer, Brett Hankison, is awaiting a retrial on related civil rights violations after a previous jury was unable to reach a verdict.

He, along with other officers involved, had not faced state criminal charges nor FBI criminal responsibility findings in the direct shooting of Taylor.

An FBI ballistics report cited that Detective Myles Cosgrove likely discharged the fatal bullet; however, no substantial legal action has been taken against him or another officer involved, Jonathan Mattingly. This complex layer of legal and investigative outcomes adds to the intricate web of this high-profile case.

The Justice Department has remarked that it is diligently reviewing the judge's decision and assessing the necessary steps forward, underlining the ongoing national and legal scrutiny the case commands.