In a revealing interview on NewsNation's CUOMO, Democratic megadonor John Morgan criticized Vice President Kamala Harris' presidential campaign for what he termed financial mismanagement.

Morgan questioned the campaign's spending decisions, hinting at a pattern of inefficiency and possible financial waste, as Newsweek reports.

During the interview, Morgan expressed concerns over the Harris campaign's spending habits, especially the extensive use of funds for consultants and advertising in states unlikely to swing Democratic.

He indicated this approach resulted in significant expenditures with questionable return on investment.

Morgan specifically highlighted the campaign's strategy in Florida, a state that ultimately voted for President-elect Donald Trump.

Despite Florida's historical voting patterns, the Harris campaign invested heavily in continuous advertising there.

Speculation Over Campaign Expenditures in Red States

He raised doubts about similar campaign spending in other typically Republican states such as Alabama and Idaho.

Morgan's critique extended to the overall culture within the campaign, which he felt was driven by personal gains of consultants and ad buyers rather than electoral strategy.

The implications of such spending are severe. The Harris campaign, together with the Democratic Party, reportedly ended the election cycle with a reported debt of $20 million.

However, there appears to be a possible resolution on the horizon according to Patrick Stauffer, the chief financial officer of the campaign.

Campaign CFO Announces Imminent Declaration of Financial Health

Stauffer has confidently stated that upcoming financial disclosures will show no outstanding debts for the campaign or the party, a significant turnaround from previous financial woes.

This statement suggests that the campaign has managed to stabilize its finances after the election, although it does not address the underlying issues raised by Morgan regarding the strategic allocation of campaign funds.

Morgan's Harsh Critique of Harris's Campaign

Morgan did not mince words when discussing the implications of these financial strategies on Harris's future.

He suggested that the apparent mismanagement could severely impact Harris's political career, stating, "A lot of people got rich on the back of donors trying to stop Trump. And I think this disqualifies her forever -- forever. If you can't run a campaign, you can't run America."

His comments underscore a deep skepticism about Harris's ability to manage larger administrative responsibilities, given the perceived inefficiencies of her campaign.

Continuous Post-Election Fundraising Efforts

Despite the election loss, Harris continues to engage with donors. She and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, are scheduled to hold a call with top donors to discuss the campaign and its aftermath.

This continued effort to fundraise and engage with the financial backers of the campaign suggests an ongoing commitment to addressing supporters' concerns and possibly preparing for future political endeavors.

The discussion with donors will likely cover the financial decisions made during the campaign and outline steps for moving forward, providing a platform for Harris to rebuild trust and address any lingering concerns about her campaign management skills.