During a speech in Wisconsin, former President Donald Trump unleashed a series of sharp criticisms aimed at Vice President Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden.

Trump attributed the nation's troubles directly to current vice-presidential leadership, sparking controversy with remarks suggesting a diagnosis of mental impairment, as Breitbart reports.

The former president's critique was centered on Harris's handling of significant national issues, including the economy, border security, the withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

He contrasted Harris's performance with Biden's, claiming that while Biden became mentally impaired over time, Harris had these challenges from birth.

Trump's Harsh Words Stir Controversy

The former president did not hold back, stating, "Joe Biden became mentally impaired. Kamala was born that way." He added, "And if you think about it, only a mentally disabled person could have allowed this to happen to our country."

These statements have ignited debates across political and public spheres about the appropriateness and impact of such comments on political discourse.

Delegated Duties and a Shift in Responsibility

According to Trump, Biden has handed over the majority of his responsibilities as commander-in-chief to Harris, encompassing both foreign and domestic policies.

This move, as Trump suggests, might have exacerbated the issues facing the nation under the current administration.

Political analysts are scrutinizing the implications of such a delegation, debating whether it has influenced the administration's effectiveness.

Public Perception and Media Influence

Amidst these controversies, Kamala Harris's approval ratings have shown significant fluctuation. Initially struggling with low popularity, her ratings saw a 16-point increase in recent months.

Digital strategist Greg Price has suggested that this change is largely due to increased media coverage, which might have shaped public perception.

On X, he noted, "What changed? The media coverage. Nothing about Kamala Harris has changed. The media machine has kicked into overdrive and too many people in America still think the news is real."

Examining the Impact of Media on Politics

Price's comments highlight a growing concern about the role of media in politics, particularly how it can influence public opinion and approval ratings.

This concern resonates with polling data from Economist/YouGov, which suggests that 48% of Americans think Harris says what people want to hear, compared to 36% who believe she speaks her true convictions.

This perception has been a pivotal aspect of Harris's political career, often criticized as inauthentic and overly tailored to public preferences at the expense of taxpayer interests.

The Fallout of Political Rhetoric

The fallout from Trump's comments is yet to be fully realized, but it serves as a stark reminder of the polarized nature of American political rhetoric.

The statements have spurred discussions about the boundaries of political speech and the responsibilities of public figures in shaping discourse.

As the political landscape continues to evolve, the effects of such rhetoric on political figures' careers and public sentiment remain a focal point of both media and voter attention.