We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Durbin Effort to Push Supreme Court Ethics Bill Stalled Amid Alito Debate

 June 13, 2024

In a significant congressional move, efforts to establish stricter ethics rules for Supreme Court justices were blocked in the Senate.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin's bid to advance a Supreme Court ethics reform was halted by a procedural objection from Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, as Fox News reports.

Last Wednesday, a critical development unfolded on the Senate floor. Durbin, along with Democrats Sheldon Whitehouse, Richard Blumenthal, and Peter Welch, presented the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act, aiming for a vote.

Their attempt, however, faced immediate resistance as Graham, the Senate Judiciary Committee's ranking member, objected to the unanimous consent necessary for the bill's progression. This procedural block effectively stalled the legislative effort.

Notably, the bill proposes the creation of a comprehensive ethics code for the Supreme Court, which would be publicly accessible. It also seeks to establish a formal process for filing and reviewing complaints against justices.

Legislative Journey and Partisan Divide Highlighted

Prior to this, the proposed legislation had successfully passed through the Judiciary Committee, albeit strictly along party lines. All committee Democrats supported the bill, while Republicans opposed it.

The support of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer was evident as he lauded the bill's passage out of committee, emphasizing its importance in ensuring judicial accountability.

Despite Schumer's backing, the bill has remained in limbo, unable to move beyond the committee's approval due to the partisan gridlock.

Controversies Around Justice Alito Stir Ethical Concerns

The push for the bill has been further intensified by ongoing controversies surrounding Justice Samuel Alito. Issues related to Alito include his display of controversial flags at his residence and his decision not to recuse himself from certain key election-related cases despite public outcry.

Adding to the controversy were Alito's remarks captured during a June 3 dinner hosted by the Supreme Court Historical Society, during which he commented on ideological differences and referenced "godliness" in the context of judicial perspectives.

These incidents have fueled debates about the necessity and urgency of implementing stringent ethical standards for Supreme Court justices.

Political Leaders Weigh in on Judicial Ethics

Reacting to the developments, Graham expressed concerns about the implications of the bill on judicial independence. "There are provisions in this bill that should bother anybody that cares about an independent judiciary," he stated.

In contrast, Schumer reaffirmed his support for the legislative effort. "I support Chairman Durbin, Senator Whitehouse, and the Judiciary Committee’s work on SCOTUS ethics reform, and I look forward to working with them to make progress on this legislation," he remarked.

Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell took a firm stance in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, defending the Supreme Court's ability to govern itself without external interference. McConnell criticized the Democratic push as an attempt to undermine the court's constitutional autonomy.

Broader Implications for Supreme Court Governance

The debate over the Supreme Court's ethics underscores a crucial aspect of American governance. The outcome of this legislative effort may significantly impact the public's trust in the judiciary.

As the bill remains stalled, the dialogue surrounding judicial ethics continues to evoke strong opinions across the political spectrum, highlighting the complex balance between judicial independence and accountability.

The ongoing debate will likely persist as stakeholders from various quarters weigh the potential changes to how the Supreme Department is governed.

In conclusion, the stalled bill reflects the contentious nature of judicial reform debates in America. As political divisions prevent the advancement of the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act, the nation remains attentive to how these ethical concerns will eventually be addressed in the judiciary.