We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Survey Reveals Strong Bipartisan Support for Hunter Biden Verdict

 June 23, 2024

In a striking display of bipartisan agreement, a recent Economist/YouGov poll reveals that a majority of Americans across all political affiliations endorse the conviction of Hunter Biden on felony gun charges.

A federal jury in Delaware found Hunter Biden guilty on three counts on June 11, with a poll indicating broad support for the verdict, Newsmax reported.

The conviction by the federal Delaware jury centers on three felony gun charges, laying the groundwork for potential penalties that could be severe. The news has sparked widespread attention given the high-profile nature of the case and the defendant's connection to President Joe Biden.

Jury's Decision Met With Majority Approval

The poll, conducted from June 16 to 18 among 1,600 U.S. adults, shows that 67% agree with the jury's decision, demonstrating significant consensus among the American public. Approval rates differed slightly by political affiliation but remained high across the board.

Among Democrats, 60% supported the verdict, compared to 61% of independents and a notably higher 80% of Republicans. This spread suggests a rare cross-party concurrence on a judicial outcome, particularly within a politically charged case.

Public Skepticism on Presidential Pardon

Regarding the potential for a presidential pardon, the poll indicates a strong stance against it, with 74% of respondents opposing it. This sentiment holds despite President Biden's previous assurances that he would neither pardon nor commute his son's sentence.

The public remains divided on whether the president will uphold his commitment, with opinions split almost evenly. About one-third of the respondents each believed he would pardon, he wouldn't, or were unsure, highlighting ongoing uncertainty and speculation about the case's future.

Discrepancies in Public and Political Reaction

Disapproval of the verdict, though significantly lower, was highest among Democrats at 19%, followed by independents at 9% and Republicans at 6%. These figures illustrate the variances in perception and reaction among different voter blocks, further complicating the narrative surrounding the case.

Comparatively, a previous poll by The Economist/YouGov regarding Donald Trump's conviction showed dramatically contrasting approval rates, highlighting the deep political divides that often characterize such cases.

Legal Experts Weigh In

Former New Jersey Superior Court Judge Andrew Napolitano has commented on the potential outcomes for Hunter Biden, given the nature of the charges and prevailing legal standards. "These statutes under which he was convicted have already been found unconstitutional by a federal appellate court, which believes that they interfere with the right of the people to keep and bear arms under the Supreme Court's Bruen opinion," he stated.

Napolitano's insight suggests that despite the convictions, jail time might be unlikely for Biden. "What is the court going to do? What is the judge going to do with [Hunter] Biden? My opinion: no jail time," he elaborated, indicating a possible leniency in sentencing due to constitutional concerns.

Future Implications of the Verdict

The case against Hunter Biden, involving potential penalties of up to 25 years in prison and a $750,000 fine, underscores the gravity of the charges. However, the legal debates surrounding the constitutionality of the statutes under which he was convicted add complexity to the eventual sentencing.

This conviction not only holds personal ramifications for Hunter Biden but also has broader political implications, especially considering the backdrop of his father's presidency and the forthcoming election cycle.

In summary, the conviction of Hunter Biden has garnered substantial approval across the political spectrum, reflecting a shared trust in the judicial process among the American populace.

This consensus is juxtaposed with concerns about potential presidential interference and the constitutional validity of the charges, painting a multifaceted picture of contemporary political and legal landscapes.