Victor Marx defeats GOP establishment pick to win Colorado Republican gubernatorial primary
Marine Corps veteran Victor Marx edged out state Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer in what Fox News described as the closest Republican gubernatorial primary in Colorado history, winning the GOP nomination by fewer than 3,000 votes and setting up a November clash with Democratic Attorney General Phil Weiser.
The Associated Press called the race on July 10, more than a week after the June 30 primary, after the razor-thin margin required days of counting. Marx, a political outsider, evangelical pastor, and founder of All Things Possible Ministries, beat not only Kirkmeyer but also state Rep. Scott Bottoms, who trailed both front-runners.
The result is a clean upset of the Colorado Republican establishment, which had lined up behind Kirkmeyer. It also hands the party a nominee whose unconventional biography and grassroots appeal will be tested in a state that hasn't sent a Republican to the governor's mansion in more than two decades.
An outsider's margin of victory
Marx's win was narrow but decisive enough for the AP to call it. The final count, tracked by NBC News election results, showed Marx leading Kirkmeyer by under 3,000 votes. Bottoms finished a distant third.
In a three-minute video posted to X after the race was called, Marx addressed supporters, and skeptics. The Washington Examiner reported that Marx used the video to urge Republicans who hadn't backed him to rally behind his general-election campaign.
"If you're frustrated, skeptical, or wondering if anything can actually change, I just proved it by winning the primary."
Rep. Lauren Boebert had endorsed Marx before the primary. Rep. Gabe Evans congratulated him afterward, describing him as a military veteran and evangelical pastor. President Trump, notably, has not endorsed Marx.
That dynamic, grassroots enthusiasm outrunning institutional support, with or without a presidential nod, has become a recurring feature of Republican primaries this cycle. A similar pattern played out when a Navy SEAL challenger upended Thomas Massie in Kentucky's GOP primary earlier this year.
Kirkmeyer concedes, with a parting shot
Kirkmeyer, the establishment's preferred candidate, posted a statement to X after the race was called. Her tone was gracious on the surface but carried an unmistakable edge.
"Now the voters will make the final decision in November, and I hope they choose the path that is best for Colorado. I'm still proud of the campaign we ran... and, for the record, I still haven't killed anyone."
That last line was a pointed reference to one of the most controversial elements of Marx's biography. Marx has claimed publicly that his stepfather forced him to kill a man when he was seven years old. The claim became a flashpoint during the primary.
Both Kirkmeyer and Bottoms had previously said they would not support Marx's general-election campaign if he won the nomination. They characterized him as an unqualified "con man" who tells "tall tales." The specific attribution, which candidate used which term, was not made clear in available reporting.
As of the race being called, Bottoms had not addressed the final results on social media. Whether either losing candidate will ultimately back the nominee or sit out the general election remains an open question, and a potentially significant one for a party that needs every available vote in a blue-leaning state.
The general-election landscape
Marx will face Phil Weiser, Colorado's attorney general and the Democratic nominee, in November. Weiser won his own primary with a sizable lead over Sen. Michael Bennet, though exact vote totals were not specified. The race is for the seat being vacated by term-limited Gov. Jared Polis.
Colorado presents a steep climb for any Republican statewide candidate. The AP noted that the state backed Kamala Harris by more than 10 points over Trump in 2024. No Republican has won the Colorado governorship since 2002.
That two-decade drought means Marx's outsider appeal, the very quality that carried him past the establishment pick, will face a very different electorate in November. Primary voters rewarded a Marine veteran and pastor who ran against the party machine. General-election voters in Colorado trend a different direction entirely.
The broader 2026 cycle has already produced a string of primary upsets and realignments on both sides of the aisle. In New York, Brad Lander ousted Dan Goldman in a Democratic primary that caught many observers off guard.
What Marx represents
Marx's biography is unusual by any political standard. He describes himself as a "high-risk humanitarian" and founded All Things Possible Ministries. His Marine Corps service forms the backbone of his campaign identity. His childhood claim, that his stepfather forced him to kill at age seven, has drawn scrutiny, support, and outright hostility from different corners of the Republican electorate.
His primary opponents weaponized that claim. Marx's supporters treated it as evidence of a man who overcame extraordinary trauma. Voters, in the end, sided with Marx, barely.
The Colorado GOP now faces a familiar dilemma: unify behind a nominee the establishment openly tried to stop, or risk handing the general election to Democrats by default. Kirkmeyer's refusal to commit to supporting Marx, paired with Bottoms's silence, suggests unity will not come easily.
Rep. Boebert's early endorsement of Marx is worth watching in this context. Boebert has positioned herself as a loyalist willing to back insurgent candidates when she believes the moment calls for it. Whether her support translates into broader party consolidation around Marx remains to be seen.
A divided party, a difficult map
Newsmax reported that the result represented a clear upset of the party's preferred choice, underscoring the gap between GOP leadership and the Republican base in Colorado.
That gap is not unique to Colorado. Across the country, 2026 primaries have exposed tensions between establishment-aligned candidates and outsider challengers running on populist energy. Democrats have their own internal fractures to manage heading into November.
But the math in Colorado is unforgiving. A state that hasn't elected a Republican governor in over twenty years is not a place where intra-party division is a luxury anyone can afford. If Kirkmeyer and Bottoms meant what they said about refusing to support Marx, the Democratic nominee starts November with a built-in advantage beyond the state's already blue tilt.
The question no one has answered
Marx proved he could win a primary. He outworked and out-hustled the establishment's chosen candidate in a race so close it took ten days to call. That is not nothing.
But the open questions are real. Can a political outsider with no elected experience and a biography that even fellow Republicans called into question compete in a general election against a sitting attorney general? Will the party unify, or will the same leaders who called Marx a "con man" sit on their hands through November?
And what does it say about the state of the Colorado GOP that its establishment couldn't hold a primary against a first-time candidate who won by fewer than 3,000 votes?
Colorado Republicans chose the fighter over the safe pick. Now they'll find out whether the fight was worth having, or whether the establishment's refusal to accept the result hands Democrats the governor's mansion for another four years.
Voters picked their nominee. The question is whether the party's leaders will respect that choice, or prove, once again, that the biggest obstacle to Republican wins is Republicans.




