Jeffrey Veltri, the FBI agent leading the investigation into the recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump, is facing scrutiny over allegations of bias against the former president.

A whistleblower recently came forward to claim that Veltri has been "adamantly and vocally Anti-Trump," and the revelation comes within a week of the latest assassination attempt on the GOP nominee, as the Post Millennial reports.

Veltri currently heads the FBI's Miami Field Office, a position he has held since March 2023. The whistleblower's claims, first reported by Fox News and the Washington Times, allege that Veltri's bias was known within the bureau long before his promotion.

According to the whistleblower, Veltri was instructed to delete anti-Trump posts from his social media accounts before his appointment as head of the Miami Bureau.

Allegations of Social Media Scrubbing

The FBI leadership, including Director Christopher Wray, Deputy Director Paul Abbate, and Executive Assistant Director Jennifer Moore, allegedly participated in efforts to ensure that Veltri’s political leanings would not be publicized. The whistleblower disclosed that Veltri's anti-Trump social media activity was scrubbed, leading to concerns about his impartiality in overseeing investigations related to the former president.

One of the whistleblower’s statements emphasized the involvement of top FBI officials: "Wray, Abbate, and Moore wanted to ensure that Veltri appeared non-political, Veltri was ordered to remove all of his Facebook and social media posts that were Anti-Trump." This has sparked questions about whether Veltri’s political views could influence his work on cases involving Trump, especially given the high-profile nature of the latest assassination attempt.

Concerns Over Political Bias in Investigations

In addition to the social media allegations, Veltri reportedly played a role in suspending the security clearances of FBI agents whom he deemed to be "right-wing radicals." This raises further concerns about whether his political stance could impact the integrity of the investigations he leads.

The whistleblower added, "The home of President Donald Trump is located in the area of responsibility of the Miami Field Office. It was well known that Veltri was adamantly and vocally Anti-Trump." With Veltri in charge of investigations in this region, particularly those involving Trump, the allegations have prompted public debate on whether an impartial investigator should take over the case.

Details of the Assassination Attempt

The latest assassination attempt on Trump occurred last Sunday at a golf course owned by the former president. The suspect, identified as Ryan Routh, is reportedly a pro-Ukraine activist and a supporter of the Democratic Party. Armed with an AK-style rifle, Routh waited for around 12 hours near the course before being confronted by Secret Service agents. After a brief standoff, Routh was fired upon, which led him to flee the scene. He was arrested shortly after.

During a press conference held on Monday, Veltri addressed the media, describing the assassination attempt as a "serious incident." While providing some details about the ongoing investigation, Veltri emphasized that the U.S. Attorney's Office was actively pursuing charges against Routh. "We view this as extremely serious and are determined to provide answers as to what led up to the events that took place," Veltri said.

He added, "We must also stress the U.S. Attorney’s office is pursuing charges, and that limits some details we can publicly disclose."

Whistleblower’s Allegations Gain Attention

The timing of the whistleblower's allegations has raised suspicions about the FBI's handling of the investigation. While Veltri assured the public that the FBI would provide answers, the whistleblower's claims are being scrutinized in media outlets, casting a shadow over the investigation's transparency.

Critics argue that an individual with perceived political bias may not be the best choice to lead such a sensitive investigation. Some are calling for Veltri to step aside to ensure that the case is handled fairly and impartially.

The allegations have reignited broader discussions about political bias within the FBI, especially regarding investigations involving high-profile figures like Donald Trump. With Veltri at the center of this controversy, the calls for greater transparency in the bureau’s decision-making process have intensified.

FBI’s Response and Potential Impact on Case

Though the FBI has not commented directly on the whistleblower’s statements, Veltri’s previous involvement in politically charged cases adds to the complexity of the situation. His role in suspending security clearances for agents labeled as "right-wing radicals" has already drawn criticism from some members of the public and political commentators.

As the investigation continues, many are watching closely to see how the FBI will respond to these allegations and whether Veltri will remain in charge of the investigation. The agency's reputation for impartiality and professionalism could be at stake, depending on the outcome of the ongoing probe.

Conclusion

The investigation into the recent assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump has been overshadowed by allegations of anti-Trump bias against the FBI agent leading the case.

Whistleblower disclosures suggest that Jeffrey Veltri, head of the Miami Field Office, was ordered to delete anti-Trump social media posts before his promotion.

These allegations, combined with Veltri's past actions, have raised concerns about the integrity of the investigation. As the FBI continues its inquiry into the attempted attack, questions about political bias within the bureau remain at the forefront of public discussion.