Hold onto your hats, folks—a federal judge just tossed out a criminal case against a TikTok streamer with a penchant for exposing supposed government overreach, and the story’s got more twists than a pretzel factory.

In a stunning ruling, a Los Angeles court dismissed charges against Carlitos Ricardo Parias, a popular South L.A. TikTok personality known for his raw footage of police and immigration enforcement antics, as ABC News reports.

Parias, a Mexican citizen residing in the U.S. without authorization according to federal officials, boasts over 340,000 followers who tune in for his unfiltered takes on federal arrest activities and immigration demonstrations.

Judge Slams Government Over Constitutional Missteps

The drama kicked off in October when Parias allegedly drove his vehicle into a federal officers’ ride, leading to charges of assault with a deadly weapon and damaging government property.

During the clash, Parias took a bullet to the elbow, landed in the hospital, and later found himself released on bond—only to be scooped up again and held in an immigration facility in Adelanto, California.

Last month, he faced a formal indictment, but the real bombshell came when his legal team was reportedly stonewalled from meeting with him during his detention.

Case Dismissed With No Chance of Revival

On Saturday, Judge Fernando Olguin threw out the case, citing serious constitutional violations due to the government’s refusal to let Parias’s lawyers access him while in custody.

The dismissal came with prejudice, a legal smackdown meaning prosecutors can’t dust off the same charges and try again, no matter how much they might want to.

Judge Olguin didn’t mince words, stating, “In short, the government’s failure to coordinate the overlapping actions of its separate agencies while relentlessly pursuing Mr. Parias’s criminal proceedings created a situation from which constitutional violations could—and did—occur.”

Government Fumbles, But Will It Appeal?

Now, let’s unpack that judicial jab—when agencies can’t get their act together, it’s the little guy who pays the price, and this time, the court said enough is enough.

The U.S. Attorney’s office, however, isn’t waving the white flag just yet, with plans to possibly appeal the ruling, showing they’re not ready to let this one slide.

Their official statement read, “We strongly disagree with the court’s version of the facts as well as its legal conclusions.”

Balancing Rights Amid Immigration Debates

Disagree all you want, but when a judge calls out constitutional fouls, it’s a reminder that even in heated policy battles over immigration, basic rights aren’t up for negotiation.

While some might argue Parias’s actions in October crossed a dangerous line, the court’s focus on due process over bureaucratic bungling sends a clear message: the system isn’t above accountability, no matter who’s in the crosshairs.

This case isn’t just about one TikTok star; it’s a glaring spotlight on how immigration enforcement and criminal justice intersect, often leaving individuals caught in a web of red tape while progressive policies sometimes seem to prioritize optics over order—yet, at the end of the day, the Constitution must stand tall.