DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Florida Judge Orders CNN to Release Financial Records in Defamation Suit Over Afghanistan Coverage

 October 5, 2024

A Florida judge has ruled that CNN must provide financial documents requested by a U.S. Navy veteran in a defamation lawsuit related to the network's coverage of the 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal.

Zachary Young, the veteran and owner of Nemex Enterprises Inc., alleges that CNN defamed him by portraying his company as profiting illegally during evacuation efforts in Afghanistan, and the defamation case is scheduled for trial on Jan. 6, 2025, in Bay County, Florida, and the judge's order could shape the trajectory of the proceedings, as the Post Millennial reports.

Young filed the lawsuit against CNN shortly after the broadcast at issue, claiming the network damaged his reputation by describing his company's evacuation efforts in a negative light. The segment, which focused on chaotic attempts to help Afghans flee the country following the U.S. military's withdrawal, included statements that implied Young's company was exploiting desperate individuals seeking escape from the region.

According to the lawsuit, CNN journalists used terms such as "black market" and "exorbitant" when referring to Young's business practices. In the segment, network personality Jake Tapper commented that there was "a black market full of promises, demands of exorbitant fees, and no guarantee of safety or success."

Alex Marquardt, another reporter, echoed these sentiments, claiming that "desperate Afghans are being exploited" by companies charging "exorbitant, often impossible amounts." Marquardt specifically mentioned that Young's company was requesting $75,000 for transportation services.

Young's legal team argues that these statements were misleading and harmed his reputation, especially since he had informed CNN of factual inaccuracies in their reporting before the segment aired. Despite his attempt to correct the narrative, the broadcast went ahead, leading to his defamation lawsuit.

Judge Orders CNN to Release Documents

In response to the lawsuit, CNN has been fighting the discovery process, particularly the request to hand over financial records that could provide insight into the network's decision-making process surrounding the segment. The network's legal team expressed concerns over the scope of the discovery and its relevance to the defamation claim.

However, Judge William Henry of the 14th Judicial Circuit Court ruled on the matter, ordering CNN to provide specific financial documents dating back to September 2021. While the judge agreed to limit the timeframe for the discovery, he also allowed for some exceptions, including records from as far back as Jan. 1, 2021, if relevant to the case.

Additionally, Young has been authorized to subpoena Warner Bros. Discovery, CNN’s parent company, to obtain the necessary documents. The judge’s ruling is considered a significant step forward for Young’s case, as it will enable his legal team to investigate whether CNN had any financial motives behind its portrayal of Nemex Enterprises.

Defamation Claims Center on Afghan Evacuations

The central issue in the lawsuit is the alleged defamation caused by CNN’s reporting on companies involved in the chaotic efforts to evacuate people from Afghanistan. Following the U.S. military's withdrawal in August 2021, numerous private companies stepped in to assist with evacuations. However, many of these operations, including those by Young's company, faced scrutiny from the media.

Young contends that CNN unfairly targeted his company by suggesting that it charged exorbitant fees without guaranteeing safe transport. In his defense, Young maintains that his company operated within the bounds of the law and provided a valuable service to those in need during an extremely volatile period.

His attorneys assert that the broadcast damaged both his personal and professional reputation, leading to financial losses for his company. They argue that CNN’s portrayal of Nemex Enterprises as part of a "black market" was not only false but also reckless.

January 2025 Trial Set in Bay County

As the case moves toward trial, both parties are preparing for what could be a highly publicized legal battle. The trial date is currently set for Jan. 6, 2025. Given the nature of the case, which involves a high-profile news network and a sensitive geopolitical issue, the trial is expected to attract significant media attention.

CNN’s legal team has not commented on the recent ruling but is likely to continue challenging the discovery process. The network has maintained that its reporting was accurate and falls under the protection of the First Amendment.

Warner Bros. Discovery Subpoena Adds Pressure

The addition of Warner Bros. Discovery as a target for subpoenas adds another layer of complexity to the case. The financial documents from the parent company could potentially reveal internal discussions or decisions that influenced CNN's editorial choices regarding its Afghanistan coverage. Young’s legal team is expected to use this information to strengthen their argument that the network acted recklessly in airing the segment.

For Young, the upcoming trial represents an opportunity to clear his name and hold CNN accountable for what he views as damaging and inaccurate reporting. His attorneys have indicated that they will seek damages for the harm done to his reputation and business.

Conclusion

The defamation case against CNN, initiated by U.S. Navy veteran Zachary Young, is moving forward after a Florida judge ordered the network to release financial records related to the controversial 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal segment.

Young claims that CNN defamed his company, Nemex Enterprises, by implying that it illegally profited from evacuation efforts, while CNN continues to defend its reporting.

The civil trial is scheduled for January 2025, with subpoenas issued to both CNN and its parent company, Warner Bros. Discovery. The outcome could set a significant precedent for media defamation cases in the future.