DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Florida Sues Biden Over Noncitizen Voter Roll Dispute

 October 18, 2024

The state of Florida has initiated legal proceedings against the Biden administration, asserting that it is obstructed in its efforts to verify immigration records, thereby hindering the state's capability to maintain up-to-date voter lists.

The lawsuit represents ongoing friction between Republican-led states and federal authorities over handling noncitizen registration for voting, as Fox News reports.

Florida's Lawsuit Claims Federal Inaction

Florida has accused the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of not meeting its responsibilities when it comes to verification of immigration records, a process Florida deems essential for the integrity of its voter rolls.

The state contends that this verification is necessary to ensure that only eligible citizens participate in elections. The lawsuit states that Florida has an agreement with DHS to utilize the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program to assist in this verification process.

The southern border situation, according to Florida, has resulted in millions of noncitizens entering the United States, which complicates efforts to account for immigration status independently.

Consequently, Florida claims it lacks the means to efficiently maintain immigration records without federal cooperation. The complaint further outlines that Florida's Department of State was unable to confirm the citizenship status of individuals identified as suspect voters due to insufficient identifiers.

In its legal submission, Florida requested assistance from DHS’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) but was denied. The lack of cooperation, as per the state's argument, is unlawful and they are seeking a court order to mandate a federal response to their request.

Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody stressed the importance of voting rights being reserved exclusively for American citizens and criticized the current administration for an alleged influx of illegal immigrants.

Federal Perspective on Voting Security

Responding to the claims, a DHS spokesperson stated that the department does not comment on current legal disputes. However, DHS emphasized that federal statutes clearly prohibit noncitizens from participating in elections.

Furthermore, the department described the SAVE program as the most secure method for verifying citizenship or immigration status, which plays a critical role in authenticating voter registration details.

The issue of voter roll maintenance is not unique to Florida. Ohio has similarly sought access to federal databases, introducing its own lawsuit to gain verification through DHS resources. These cases underscore a larger political debate on the balance of power between state initiatives and federal oversight in election security.

These events unfold amid a broader national debate, where the Department of Justice has previously challenged states like Alabama and Virginia over their initiatives to exclude noncitizens from voter lists. Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin characterized these legal actions as politically driven.

Significance of Maintaining Voter Integrity

Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd voiced concerns about barriers imposed by the federal government that limit states' access to vital information necessary to ensure noncitizens do not vote in elections. He referenced the Florida Constitution, which expressly reserves voting rights for citizens.

The crux of Florida's lawsuit lies in the perceived failure of federal obligations to support state efforts in verifying voter eligibility.

This legal action is emblematic of the broader tension between state and federal governments over electoral processes and immigration policy.

The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for how states can enforce voter roll integrity and the degree of federal cooperation they can expect in these efforts. As this unfolds, it will continue to contribute to the national discourse on voter registration and election security.

Observers are keen to see how the courts will interpret the responsibilities and limits of federal and state interactions regarding voter registration and citizenship verification.

These proceedings may shape the future landscape of electoral integrity and state-federal relations.