In the New York criminal trial, testimonies revolved around undisclosed agreements and payments that were supposedly made on behalf of Trump to settle past affair allegations, Blaze Media reported.

Keith Davidson, the attorney who previously represented Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal, was a key witness. His insights provided a glimpse into the legal dealings that are at the heart of the case.

Davidson Testifies on the Absence of Trump's Signature

During his testimony, Davidson stated he never saw an agreement signed by "David Dennison" or "Peggy Peterson." He saw a version signed by Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen.

This agreement aimed to prevent Daniels from disclosing details of an alleged affair. Davidson also drafted a side agreement with their real names but left a blank space for "David Dennison," which he filled in with Trump's name.

Despite his involvement, Davidson admitted he never met Trump until the court proceedings.

Cohen's Complaints About Trump Expressed Frustration

Davidson detailed a post-election call from Cohen, dismayed at his lack of role in Washington despite his campaign efforts for Trump.

Quoting Cohen, Davidson expressed frustration: "After all I've done for that guy, not going to Washington." Cohen lamented non-reimbursement for Daniels' payment, considering it an unreciprocated expense.

Following Cohen's directive, Davidson informed the Wall Street Journal that allegations of a Trump-Daniels affair were "absolutely false," emphasizing firm denial.

Diverging Views on the Nature of Payments

Davidson disputed media's characterization of payments, calling them "considerations in a civil settlement" to mitigate litigation.

Daniels planned to discuss her life post-settlement on Jimmy Kimmel's show, aiming to enhance her career despite the agreement.

An audiotape revealed Davidson stressing the urgency of payment, fearing lost leverage if Trump lost the election, deeming the case worthless in that scenario.

McDougal viewed story publication as a career boost, anticipating a "dream deal" with promised media opportunities.

She eagerly anticipated leveraging her monthly columns in Star and OK magazines to revive her career.

These media agreements underscore the intertwining legal, personal, and professional aspects of the case, reflecting public and legal discussions.

Summary and Implications of Davidson’s Testimony

The New York court proceedings against former President Trump revealed undisclosed legal strategies and discontent among key players.

Davidson's testimonies depicted a complex interplay of legal, financial, and personal stakes, from hidden signatures to career aspirations.

As developments progress, the case maintains substantial public and legal interest.