Nathan Wade's recent deposition before the House Judiciary Committee has brought to light that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis had planned to prosecute former President Donald Trump for alleged election interference even before she officially assumed office in January 2021.

Wade, a former top prosecutor on Willis' team, disclosed that she began planning Trump's prosecution in the period following the 2020 election, but before her official commencement of duties, sparking calls for further inquiry into possible corruption of the process, as Breitbart reports.

Willis's recruitment of Wade began shortly after the 2020 election, aiming to form a team dedicated to targeting Trump for election-related charges.

Wade, who did not initially seek the position, eventually became the focal point of the search committee's efforts to fill the role.

Nathan Wade's Unanticipated Role in Prosecution

The committee's eventual persuasion of Wade to accept the job played a crucial part in establishing the prosecution's leadership. His involvement came despite his lack of initial initiative to secure the position, as Wade himself confirmed the committee's role in his appointment.

Trump, who has pleaded not guilty to the charges, argues that the efforts led by Willis are politically charged. This defense has been central to his legal strategy surrounding the election interference allegations.

Wade and Willis's personal relationship became a significant point of contention, with the two engaging in an affair that included financial exchanges from Willis's office and shared exotic vacations.

This relationship raised ethical questions regarding the integrity of the case.

Judicial Concerns Lead to Wade's Departure

In March of this year, Judge Scott McAfee evaluated the allegations surrounding Wade and Willis's personal entanglements. Despite finding no direct conflict of interest, McAfee ruled that Wade's resignation was essential to mitigate the "appearance of impropriety."

This ruling followed an ultimatum from the judge indicating that Willis could continue on the Trump case on the condition of Wade's voluntary withdrawal from his role.

Consequently, Wade stepped down amid these judicial directives.

During his recent deposition, Wade acknowledged several meetings with officials from the Biden-Harris administration. However, he offered minimal clarity on these interactions, citing a lack of recollection concerning whether they occurred in person or via teleconference.

Biden Administration Involvement Questioned

According to Wade’s recorded billing details, certain meetings extended for up to eight hours. Despite such lengths, Wade's ability to recall specifics, including the nature of these engagements -- either direct or remote -- remained unclear during his committee testimony.

The surrounding circumstances of these meetings have not been explicitly detailed by Wade, leaving an open question about the precise nature and content of these high-level discussions.

Willis's foresight into prosecuting Trump has fueled debate over the political motivations behind the charge. Wade's disclosure adds a layer of complexity, hinting at early strategic preparations by Willis before officially stepping into her role as district attorney.

Summing Up Fani Willis's Early Actions

Wade's departure, influenced by McAfee's ruling and the appearance of ethical concerns, underscores the intricate challenges in balancing personal relationships and professional responsibilities. Wade's recollections before the committee further affirm the complexities.

While the case continues to evolve, core elements surrounding Wade's involvement, his meetings with the administration, and his resignation highlight the multifaceted and potentially problematic nature of the legal proceedings against Trump.

In sum, the revelations from Wade's deposition provide a detailed backdrop to Fani Willis’s prosecutorial intentions and the unfolding judicial and ethical scrutiny in the high-profile election interference case against former President Donald Trump.