We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Google Rescinds Ban on Trump's Campaign Ad Criticizing Biden Over Inflation, Immigration

 May 6, 2024

Google has reinstated a controversial advertisement from Donald Trump's presidential campaign after initially removing it for a policy violation.

Following an uproar on social media, Google reversed its decision on a Trump campaign ad targeting Joe Biden over inflation and illegal immigration issues, as the Daily Wire reports.

This week, the tech giant pulled a political advertisement from the Trump campaign, which was directly aimed at Black voters in rural Georgia.

The ad criticized Biden for his handling of inflation and illegal immigration, areas where these voters have expressed dissatisfaction.

In the advertisement, a fictional Biden campaign worker is depicted approaching a voter who had previously supported the current president.

The voter expresses disillusionment with Biden's policies, particularly criticizing the economic burden and immigration policies.

Community Response To Controversial Advertisement

The voter's grievances are articulated with examples: "Everything costs more: food, gas, rent," and accusations about financial aid to illegal immigrants at the expense of American citizens struggling financially.

The scene concludes with the voter decisively stating a change of support: "Things were better before Biden. I’m voting for Trump." This dialogue encapsulates the advertisement's message and its target audience's sentiments.

The ad, initially archived on Google's platform, sparked controversy for its blunt critique wrapped in a dramatized scenario, leading to its temporary removal.

Academic Commentary on Political Ads

Andrew Arenge, a director at the Penn Program on Opinion Research and Election Studies, was among the first to report the ad's removal. He shared updates via the social media platform X, noting, "This ad has been removed by Google for a ‘policy violation.’"

Arenge continued, "It was live in the Google archive this morning but I just looked and it’s now been removed." His updates played a crucial role in highlighting the situation as it unfolded, which eventually led to public discourse about the ad's content and Google's policies.

Furthermore, Arenge disclosed the financial details behind the ad, revealing, "Super PAC spent over $15K targeting it at specific communities near Macon, GA after launching it on April 25th."

Google Reverses Decision Amid Public Scrutiny

The removal and subsequent reinstatement of the ad were not without consequences. The decision to reinstate the advertisement came amidst significant online backlash and discussions about free speech and political advertising.

Google's final stance was to allow the ad to remain in their archives, no longer flagging it as a policy violation. This marked a complete turnaround from their initial position.

"Google appears to have completely reversed their decision. The Make America Great Again, Inc. ads are no longer flagged for a policy violation in the Google ad archive," Arenge remarked, confirming the resolution of the issue.

Implications for Future Political Advertising

This incident highlights the delicate balance tech companies must maintain while moderating content without suppressing free speech, especially in the politically charged atmosphere of a presidential campaign.

It also underscores the significant impact of social media and public opinion in shaping the policies of even the largest tech giants in the world.

The ad's initial removal and subsequent reinstatement have sparked discussions about the boundaries of acceptable political speech and the role of tech platforms in political processes.


In conclusion, the reversal by Google on the Trump campaign ad serves as a critical case study in digital advertising, free speech, and political engagement. The ad, aimed at criticizing Biden's policies on inflation and illegal immigration, was initially removed for a policy violation but was reinstated following public outcry.

This event emphasizes the influence of social media feedback on corporate decisions and the ongoing debate over freedom of expression versus responsible content moderation.