Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro is facing renewed scrutiny over an op-ed he authored more than three decades ago, which criticized Palestinians and expressed strong pro-Israel views.

The resurfaced article, which some on the far-left might deem disqualifying, casts a spotlight on Shapiro's political stance as he is considered for the vice-presidential slot alongside Vice President Kamala Harris, amid evolving perspectives and criticism within the Democratic Party, as Fox News reports.

The op-ed, originally published in the Campus Times, the student newspaper of the University of Rochester, has resurfaced as Shapiro's name is floated for a potential vice-presidential nomination.

Shapiro, who graduated from the University of Rochester in 1995, wrote the piece in which he identified himself as a "past volunteer in the Israeli army."

The governor's spokesman, Manuel Bonder, issued a statement emphasizing that Shapiro's views have evolved significantly since his college years.

Context Of Original Op-Ed

Bonder clarified that Shapiro's high school volunteer work in Israel involved non-military activities on a kibbutz and an Israeli army base.

This intervention served to clarify misconceptions about Shapiro's volunteer work and aims to present an authoritative stance on his historical actions.

The op-ed has elicited various reactions within the Democratic Party. Notably, some members have launched the "No Genocide Josh" campaign criticizing Shapiro's past views.

Critics argue that the perspectives conveyed in his old article could impact his objectivity on Israel, should he ascend to a higher national office.

Responses From Supporters

Despite the backlash, Shapiro has garnered support from prominent figures, including Jewish members of Congress. Rep. Greg Landsman of Ohio defended Shapiro, arguing against the notion that Jewish politicians are inherently biased regarding Israel.

Shapiro has stressed his commitment to a peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

He reiterated his support for a two-state solution during a press conference held last Friday, further emphasizing his belief that both Israelis and Palestinians should have the right to determine their own futures.

Emphasizing Evolution of Views

Bonder underscored that Shapiro has built "close, meaningful, informative relationships" with various community leaders, including Muslim-American, Arab-American, Palestinian Christian, and Jewish leaders across Pennsylvania.

This aspect of Shapiro's political journey portrays his shift from the views he expressed as a young student to his current stance supporting a two-state solution.

The spokesman also highlighted the governor's commitment to bringing communities together, listening to diverse perspectives, and ensuring community safety and representation. These remarks aim to frame Shapiro as a leader capable of evolving and adapting his viewpoints based on broader experience and dialogue.

Shapiro's College Viewpoint in Detail

The original op-ed was critical of Palestinians, with Shapiro expressing doubts about their ability to establish and sustain their own homeland. "Palestinians will not peacefully coexist," Shapiro wrote, attributing this to a supposed lack of capability to form successful and peaceful nations, even with aid from Israel and the United States. His words suggested a belief that Palestinians were "too battle-minded" to create a peaceful society.

This historical context is now juxtaposed with Shapiro's current advocacy for peace and a two-state solution. "As the governor has made clear for years, he supports a two-state solution where Israelis and Palestinians can live together peacefully," explained Bonder. The spokesman’s statement underlined the importance of both sides taking necessary steps towards lasting peace.

Concluding Remarks

As Shapiro navigates through the renewed scrutiny, his evolving perspective is central to his defense. His efforts to build relationships with a wide range of community leaders show his attempt at a shift towards a more inclusive and balanced approach to Middle Eastern politics.

In conclusion, the resurfacing of Shapiro’s decades-old college op-ed has instigated a debate about his political stance and objectivity as he is considered for a potential vice-presidential position. While he faces criticism, particularly within his party, prominent supporters argue that Shapiro's views have evolved significantly. Through his consistent advocacy for a two-state solution and his efforts to engage with diverse communities, Shapiro is now working to position himself as a leader committed to peace and collaboration.