Group of 4 GOP lawmakers defies Johnson, backs Jeffries on Obamacare extension
In a stunning display of bipartisan rebellion, four House Republicans have crossed party lines to support a Democrat-led effort to extend Obamacare subsidies, thumbing their noses at Speaker Mike Johnson’s warnings, as Fox News reports.
These moderate Republicans -- Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick, Ryan Mackenzie, Rob Bresnahan, and Mike Lawler -- have signed onto House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ discharge petition to force a vote on a three-year extension of subsidies set to expire by year’s end.
Let’s be clear: this isn’t just a policy disagreement; it’s a direct challenge to the GOP’s chain of command. Johnson has cautioned against this maneuver, calling it a sidestep of proper legislative channels. Yet, these four seem more concerned with healthcare access than with towing the party line.
Republicans Break Ranks Over Healthcare Subsidies
The discharge petition, a rarely used procedural tool, hit the magic number of 218 signatures, securing the majority needed to push the bill to a vote. That’s a slap in the face to leadership, who’d rather keep this issue buried under stacks of other priorities.
Speaker Johnson has argued this end-run around standard process undermines how laws should be made. While he’s got a point about order, one wonders if stonewalling on critical subsidies is really the hill to die on.
Meanwhile, the House is mulling a separate Republican bill focused on slashing healthcare costs without touching the subsidies. It’s a classic conservative approach—cut costs, not expand programs—but it’s left moderates in the party fuming over the lack of compromise.
Moderate GOP Pushes for Bipartisan Fixes
Rep. Ryan Mackenzie, one of the defectors, has been vocal about wanting a middle ground. “I’ve always supported bipartisan solutions that would bring about healthcare affordability in this country,” Mackenzie said. Yet, he’s quick to point out that neither Jeffries nor GOP leadership has budged on blending reforms with extensions.
His frustration is palpable when he notes, “And so at this point, our leadership is not calling up a bill to extend the [Obamacare] tax credits.” Translation: if the bosses won’t act, we’ll force their hand. It’s a bold move, but it risks alienating the party base who see Obamacare as a progressive overreach.
Rep. Mike Lawler echoed that sentiment, admitting he’d prefer a bipartisan deal with reforms. “While I have been working for a bipartisan compromise with reforms, the failure of leadership to allow a vote on the floor left me with no choice but to sign the Democrats’ discharge petition,” Lawler stated. That’s a polite way of saying leadership dropped the ball.
Discharge Petition Sparks Party Tension
Lawler didn’t stop there, urging, “The speaker should immediately bring it to the floor for an up-or-down vote and let the House do the work of the American people.” It’s a reasonable demand, but expecting Johnson to cave might be wishful thinking. The speaker’s made it clear he sees this as a procedural betrayal.
Adding fuel to the fire, moderate Republicans pitched amendments to include subsidy extensions during a House Rules Committee meeting, only to see them shot down. It’s another sign that the party’s hardliners aren’t in the mood for negotiation, even when their own are begging for it.
Let’s not pretend this is just about healthcare; it’s about control. The discharge petition’s timing means the House could take up Jeffries’ bill early next year, potentially bypassing Johnson’s grip on the agenda. That’s a risky gambit for conservatives who value party unity over populist wins.
What’s Next for Obamacare Subsidies?
For now, the ball’s in the court of timing and politics. If this vote happens, it could signal a rare moment where practical governance trumps partisan gridlock -- or it could fracture the GOP further. Either way, it’s a headache Johnson didn’t need.
At the end of the day, these four Republicans aren’t wrong to prioritize keeping healthcare subsidies alive for folks who rely on them.
But aligning with Jeffries over their own speaker? That’s a tightrope walk that might just snap under the weight of party loyalty.



