DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Harris Campaign Alters Description of Walz's Military Rank on Website Amid Scandal

 August 9, 2024

Kamala Harris's presidential campaign is facing escalating scrutiny over allegedly misrepresented military claims made by vice-presidential nominee Tim Walz.

The controversy now centers on modifications made to a description of Walz’s military service record on the presidential campaign’s official website, as Breitbart reports.

Curious Changes Made

The Harris campaign recently updated Walz's biography on its official website. The description of his military rank changed from “retired command sergeant major” to merely suggesting that he once served at that rank, indicating a significant revision amidst the controversy.According to a report by Politico, the adjustment was made in response to accusations of stolen valor, which allege Walz falsely claimed a higher final military rank than what was actually earned.

The issue first gained attention when Walz abruptly left a photo opportunity with Harris after being questioned about his military background.

Revised Biography Raises Questions

The updated biography states Walz “rose to the rank of Command Sergeant Major,” but clarifies that he did not retire with that rank. This change aims to address discrepancies concerning Walz’s military service.

Further complications arose as veterans who served alongside Walz claimed he exaggerated his role, including claims of carrying weapons in war despite lacking combat experience.

The adjustments to Walz’s biography come amid allegations that he abandoned fellow service members as they prepared to deploy to Iraq, adding layers of controversy.

White House Response to Military Service Claims

The White House has largely avoided discussing the specifics of the scandal. During a press briefing, press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre highlighted Walz's service, stating, “This is someone who enlisted at 17 years old to serve his country. He was part of the Army National Guard for 24 years.”

However, Jean-Pierre refrained from addressing the discrepancies directly: “This is someone who was a high school teacher, a high school coach, as well, who grew up in a small town in the Midwest, and, so, I think his bio speaks for itself, his record speaks for itself, and I’m just not going to say anything beyond that.”

These remarks have done little to quell the growing concerns about the authenticity of Walz’s military claims.

Stolen Valor Accusations Escalate

Breitbart reporter Kristina Wong commented on the situation, highlighting the disparity in Walz's military record: "[Walz] has claimed that he is a retired command sergeant major, but his rank was reduced to master sergeant since he did not finish the requirements to retire as a command sergeant major. Despite this, he has boasted about retiring as a command sergeant major on multiple occasions."

This contradiction has cast a shadow over Walz’s credibility and by extension, the Harris campaign’s vetting process.

Despite multiple inquiries, the Harris campaign has not provided an official response to why Walz inaccurately portrayed his military service and combat experience.

Impact on the Presidential Campaign

The controversy surrounding Walz's military claims is likely to impact the Harris campaign's narrative as they introduce him as the vice-presidential candidate.

Questions about Walz's integrity and the campaign's oversight are becoming focal points for opposition criticism as the election approaches.

The unfolding scandal continues to draw attention, complicating the campaign's efforts to focus on other policy issues.

Conclusion: A Recap of the Scandal’s Developments

In conclusion, the Harris campaign faced significant backlash over inaccuracies in Tim Walz’s military service, prompting a crucial revision of his official biography.

Allegations of stolen valor and misleading service claims have intensified scrutiny on Walz and cast doubt on the campaign’s transparency and integrity. As the story develops, the campaign’s handling of the issue remains under close observation.