On Friday, the Trump campaign unveiled an advertisement in which Jerry Wartski, a survivor of the Holocaust, voiced his strong objection to Vice President Kamala Harris's comparisons of former President Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler.

Wartski, a 94-year-old Auschwitz survivor, contends that Harris's remarks are deeply offensive, particularly for those who suffered under Hitler's regime, as Fox News reports.

The nonagenarian, featured prominently in the Trump campaign's recent ad, did not mince words as he condemned Harris for her controversial analogy. "I know more about Hitler than Kamala will ever know in a thousand lifetimes," he said, clearly disapproving of the comparison drawn by the vice president. Throughout the ad, Wartski shared his lived experiences to emphasize the severity of Harris's comments.

Wartski Calls for Apology

Within the advertisement, Wartski described former President Trump using the Yiddish term "mensch," signifying a person of honorable character. He underscored Trump's longstanding support for both Jewish people and the State of Israel as evidence against the claims made by Harris.

Demanding an apology from Harris, Wartski expressed that her statements were particularly hurtful to those who endured the Holocaust, stating, "She owes my parents and everybody else who was murdered by Hitler an apology."

This news arises amidst a backdrop of Harris repeating her contentious claim on multiple occasions that week. Her comparisons surfaced in diverse settings, including at a press conference held at the U.S. Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C.

Escalating Rhetoric from Vice President

In addition to in-person events, Harris's analogies also appeared during a CNN town hall event on Wednesday. During the event, she questioned the loyalty Trump allegedly demanded by invoking a Hitler comparison and elaborated on her reasoning.

"If the President of the United States, the commander in chief, is saying to his generals, in essence, 'Why can't you be more like Hitler's generals?' Anderson, come on. This is a serious, serious issue." Harris voiced her concerns regarding Trump's leadership approach often switching to alleging his admiration for dictators.

Harris's public scrutiny was fueled by media reports that suggested former Chief of Staff John Kelly, along with other officials, alleged that Trump had previously praised Hitler's loyalty. These claims have compounded the discourse around the Trump-Hitler comparisons.

Social Media Statements Stir Controversy

Harris shared similar sentiments on the social media platform X, continuing to draw parallels between Trump and well-known autocrats. Her posts further fueled the ongoing debate regarding the appropriateness of her statements.

The Trump campaign swiftly responded with its advertisement featuring Wartski, emphasizing a diametrically opposed narrative. Wartski argued, "I know President Trump, and he would never say this, and Kamala Harris knows this," in countering Harris's allegations.

Wartski's involvement in the advertisement highlights the deep emotional resonance and historical gravity that the Hitler comparison carries for Holocaust survivors and their families. His poignant message underscores the urgency with which he approaches this sensitive topic.

Harris Faces Criticism Across Platforms

Vice President Harris's comparison has not gone without scrutiny. The discourse extends beyond her characterization of Trump, raising fundamental questions about the rhetoric used in political disagreements.

Despite the backlash, Harris has maintained her stance, positioning her remarks as a reflection on broader concerns regarding authoritarian tendencies. Her comments at the town hall, social media, and public press events form a consistent narrative of caution.

Fox News Digital sought comment from the Harris campaign in response to Wartski's criticism. However, no immediate reply was received, leaving the discourse on the matter largely one-sided and showcasing Wartski's voice more prominently.

Ongoing Debates on Political Rhetoric

The situation continues to evolve as both sides navigate the complex historical and contemporary implications of Harris's statements. The Trump campaign, through Wartski's testimony, seeks to convey Trump’s support for the Jewish community.

Meanwhile, Harris's camp stands firm, suggesting that the analogies, though provocative, speak to underlying concerns about leadership and historical awareness. The vice president’s approach underscores the importance of scrutinizing the patterns of powerful leaders.

As the dialogue persists, it encapsulates the broader theme of historical sensitivities clashing with modern-day political exchanges. With both parties doubling down on their narratives, the impact of Harris's rhetoric and Wartski's response will likely continue to reverberate across political lines.