We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Experts: Hunter Biden Could Be Acquitted in Gun Trial Despite Evidence of Guilt

 June 11, 2024

In an unprecedented legal battle, Hunter Biden stands trial for federal gun charges amidst a potential backdrop of jury nullification influenced by familial and local ties.

Hunter Biden's historic federal gun trial could, however, end in acquittal due to the potent mix of Delaware's political atmosphere and jurors' personal experiences with substance abuse, as Fox News reports.

The beleaguered son of President Joe Biden is facing three serious charges over his October 2018 purchase of a .38 revolver in Delaware.

At the heart of the case is the accusation that Biden falsely answered "No" to being an unlawful user of or addicted to controlled substances on ATF Form 4473, a required document for firearm procurement.

The Bidens' Deep Ties to Delaware Could Sway Jury Opinion

The trial gains complexity given the Biden family's deep roots in the state.

With Joe Biden's 36-year tenure as a senator and Beau Biden's eight-year role as Delaware's attorney general, their local influence is undeniable. This background sets a unique stage for the proceedings, possibly affecting the jurors' perceptions and decisions.

Jury selection revealed a crucial element that could tip the scales in Hunter's favor: nearly every juror had a personal or family history of substance abuse. Such commonality in experiences might lead jurors to empathize with Hunter Biden, who has publicly struggled with addiction issues himself.

Juror Sympathy for Substance Abuse Could Influence Verdict

Zack Smith, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, commented on the potential impact of these personal connections. "Particularly, some of the jurors might have had family or friends struggling with substance abuse issues and have some sympathy for Hunter Biden and his substance abuse issues," Smith said, highlighting the emotional dimensions at play.

The concept of jury nullification, in which jurors may acquit a defendant they believe to be guilty due to extenuating circumstances or beliefs, has surfaced prominently in this trial. Prosecutor Leo Wise urged the jury to focus on the law and evidence, notwithstanding the Biden family presence in the courtroom or personal sympathies.

Prosecution Stresses Legal Equality in Closing Arguments

"People sitting in the gallery are not evidence," Wise stated emphatically during his closing arguments, reinforcing that "nobody is above the law." This statement aims to counter any undue influence the jurors might feel due to the Biden family's prominence in the courtroom.

Throughout the trial, signs of jury disengagement have been noted, with some jurors yawning and resting their heads, suggesting potential preconceptions or biases affecting their attention to the proceedings.

Evidence and Engagement at Trial

Despite these challenges, the evidence presented by the prosecution has been substantial.

Smith noted, "Based on the charges that have been brought, and the evidence produced at trial, it certainly seems prosecutors have done their homework and done enough to convince the jury to convict Hunter Biden."

An unidentified male potential juror voiced a sentiment that reflects the state's intimate connection with the Biden saga: "This is Delaware. You can’t swing a cat without hearing something [about the case]."

Local Sentiment and National Spotlight

The trial not only tests the legal boundaries but also places Delaware's societal dynamics under the national spotlight. How this case concludes could set significant precedents for how personal backgrounds and local influence interact with legal proceedings.

In conclusion, Hunter Biden's federal gun trial encapsulates a convergence of legal scrutiny, familial influence, and personal struggles with addiction.

The potential for jury nullification adds another layer of complexity, reflecting broader themes of justice, empathy, and societal standards.

As the jury deliberates, the nation watches, awaiting a verdict that could resonate far beyond the confines of the courtroom.