We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Hunter Biden's Right to Practice Law in DC Suspended After Guilty Verdict

 June 26, 2024

The legal practice of Hunter Biden has been temporarily halted in Washington, D.C., following his recent criminal conviction.

Hunter Biden’s law license has been suspended in the nation's capital after he was found guilty of felonious activities linked to a 2018 firearm purchase, as Fox News reports, a development sure to provoke anger and frustration from members of his family.

In 2018, Hunter Biden sparked an eventual legal battle stemming from his attempt to purchase a gun. It was revealed during his recent federal trial that he made false statements about his drug use at that time, which led to his conviction on June 11.

The charges against him were severe, encompassing the making of false statements during the firearm acquisition and owning a firearm while being an unlawful user of a controlled substance.

Immediate Suspension Follows Guilty Verdict

Following the guilty verdict, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals moved swiftly to suspend Biden's law license. This decision by the Court of Appeals was triggered by a formal request from the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel, emphasizing the gravity of the criminal charges.

The suspension took effect immediately as indicated in their official E-filing system. However, it was noted that as of the morning the suspension was ordered, the D.C. Bar's website still incorrectly displayed Biden's status as "active" and in "good standing."

A Background of Professional Achievement Clouded by Personal Struggles

Hunter Biden, who has been licensed to practice law in Washington, D.C., since 2007, having earned his Juris Doctor from Yale University in 1996, and he now faces a significant blemish on his professional record due to this conviction.

His legal team has filed for a new trial, arguing jurisdictional flaws by the federal court in Delaware. This follows a perplexing retraction of a similar motion just a week earlier, without an explanation provided.

Controversial Details Emerge During Trial

The trial, which lasted nearly seven days, featured testimonies and evidence shedding light on Biden's struggle with drug addiction.

The prosecution and the defense both used Biden’s 2021 memoir, which details his challenges with substance abuse, to portray the depth of his addiction during that period.

Abbe Lowell, Biden’s defense attorney, specifically argued that at the time of the purchase, "Biden did not consider himself an active drug addict" due to prior rehab efforts.

Nevertheless, text messages revealed during the trial painted a starkly different picture. Biden admitted in texts to being engaged in crack cocaine use, even describing incidents of buying substantial amounts of the drug and using it in various locations throughout Wilmington, Delaware.

Witnesses, including Biden’s ex-wife Kathleen Buhle and former girlfriend Zoe Kestan, provided emotional testimonies about their experiences dealing with Biden's drug problems. Buhle recounted instances of removing drugs and paraphernalia from Biden's possessions to protect their children, expressing her concerns and fears about his behavior.

Biden's Future Hangs in Balance

The culmination of these proceedings awaits Biden’s sentencing, scheduled for later this year, the exact date of which remains undecided.

As the legal and personal details of Hunter Biden's case continue to unfold, the implications of his actions not only cast a shadow over his professional life but also pose significant personal repercussions.

In conclusion, Hunter Biden’s criminal conviction has led to an immediate and indefinite suspension of his law practice license.

This legal and professional setback stems from Biden’s drug-related misstatements during a 2018 gun purchase and his subsequent conviction on federal charges.

As the world awaits his sentencing, the complexities of his personal trials and ongoing legal battles remain a pivotal topic of public and legal scrutiny.