The Green Party's presidential candidate was criticized after incorrectly stating the number of lawmakers in the U.S. House Representatives, raising doubts about her readiness for the Oval Office.

During a recent interview on The Breakfast Club, Jill Stein stumbled in response to a basic question about American government from host Angela Rye, as Breitbart reports.

Stein's Response Leads to Public Criticism

Initially, Stein deflected the question, choosing instead to discuss challenges with ballot access faced by the Green Party. Rye, persistent in her line of questioning, pressed Stein for a specific number.

Stein hesitated before suggesting that there were "600 some" voting members in the House, a significant overstatement.

Rye promptly corrected her, clarifying that there are 435 voting members. This exchange was met with disbelief and was quickly picked up by media outlets and social media commentators, who questioned Stein's understanding of basic governmental structures.

Public Figures and Media React

Following the interview, several public figures voiced their concerns. Wisconsin U.S. Representative Mark Pocan remarked on the gravity of Stein's error given her repeated presidential bids.

Media personality Brian Baez commented on the incident, expressing astonishment at Stein's lack of basic political knowledge.

The interview, dubbed "brutal" by Salon magazine, highlighted a moment in which Rye asked Stein to focus solely on the question at hand, emphasizing the need for a direct answer about the House's composition. Stein's further attempt to include the Senate in her answer did little to salvage the situation.

Social Media and Previous Controversies

Social media users also took to platforms to express their skepticism about Stein's qualifications for the presidency, referencing her previous controversial statements and actions.

In 2016, Stein had made headlines for false allegations about "illegal" voting machines in Wisconsin and overstated claims about sea level rise.

Last month's statement to Breitbart News, in which Stein criticized the Democratic Party for obstructing her campaign's ballot access by labeling them "Anti-Democratic," was also brought back into the spotlight, framing her as a divisive figure in political discourse.

Stein's History of Controversial Remarks

Jill Stein's history with controversial and sometimes inaccurate statements has consistently sparked debate. Her claims have ranged from environmental issues to electoral integrity, often leading to public correction and criticism.

Despite these challenges, Stein has remained a vocal figure in Green Party politics, advocating for broader ballot access and challenging mainstream political narratives.

However, her credibility has been repeatedly questioned, affecting her public and political standing.

Looking Forward: Impact on Political Career

The recent gaffe raises questions about the impact such errors may have on Stein's future political endeavors.

Critics argue that a presidential candidate should have a firm grasp of basic U.S. government facts, and missteps of this nature could severely impact voter confidence.

As the political landscape evolves, the importance of accuracy and informed statements becomes increasingly critical, especially for candidates outside the traditional two-party system aiming to establish credibility and attract voters from a broad spectrum.

While Stein has committed to addressing these issues, the path forward remains challenging as she continues to face scrutiny over her readiness for the highest office in the land.