DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Johnson Recalls Alarming Private Meeting with Biden

 January 19, 2025

In a candid revelation, House Speaker Mike Johnson has expressed concern about President Joe Biden's cognitive health, an issue revealed to him during a private meeting that took him multiple attempts to secure.

Johnson recently reminisced about precisely when serious concerns about President Biden's mental fitness and decision-making capabilities arose in his mind after an especially odd White House meeting, as the Daily Wire reports.

A Republican representative from Louisiana, Johnson ascended to the position of speaker of the House in October 2023. Once in office, he promptly sought an audience with President Joe Biden, driven by pressing concerns related to national security.

Repeated Delays in Scheduling Meeting

Despite the urgency, Johnson faced considerable delays in securing the meeting. The wait extended over two months, with the president’s team continually stating that Biden was unavailable. This prolonged wait only heightened Johnson’s frustration.

In an effort to accelerate the process, Johnson voiced his displeasure to the media. He emphasized the necessity for communication between the speaker and the president, especially in times of significant national concern. His comments appeared to prompt a change in the White House's response.

Eventually, a meeting was arranged, although it was initially framed as a broad discussion involving top Democrats and Cabinet members, particularly focusing on issues regarding Ukraine. However, the meeting took a surprising turn.

Private Discussion Shifts Meeting Focus

In an unexpected move, President Biden chose to dismiss the attendees from the room to hold a private conversation with Johnson. This decision went against the wishes of his own staff who potentially wanted a more structured dialogue.

During the private exchange, Johnson inquired about a critical issue regarding the export of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to Europe. This query stemmed from a pause in exports that had caught Johnson’s attention.

Biden's response to this inquiry was startling. The president professed that he had not signed any executive order to halt LNG exports. Instead, he believed he had only approved a study to explore the effects of LNG.

Johnson Questions Presidential Awareness

The apparent disconnect between the president’s understanding and the actions taken in his name alarmed Johnson. He surmised from Biden’s reaction that the president might genuinely be unaware of certain critical executive decisions.

After exiting the meeting, Johnson confided in the press about the weight of his concerns. The recent encounter had left him deeply troubled about the leadership of the country.

Johnson's remarks questioned the clarity around who was truly in control of the nation’s executive decisions. He expressed uncertainty about the individuals influencing the president’s actions, which has led to broader implications about governance and oversight.

Implications of the Speaker's Revelations

Johnson’s concerns, especially about Biden’s command over his own directives, have opened a conversation about the processes surrounding presidential approvals. This has led to increased scrutiny of how decisions are made at the highest levels of government.

The situation has also underscored the critical importance of direct and effective communication between Congress and the president. Ensuring alignment and understanding in national security matters is of heightened importance for the country's safety and governance.

Moving forward, both officials and the public are left to wonder how these revelations may impact future interactions between the legislative and executive branches. Additionally, the implications of Johnson's statements could influence further electoral and administrative evaluations.

Further Discussions on Leadership Concerns

The dialogue surrounding the president's capability is not new, but Johnson's recent comments add another layer to the ongoing discourse. Concerns about leadership perhaps point towards broader structural or procedural issues within the administration.

This incident potentially strengthens calls for more transparency and accountability in the decision-making processes that affect key national issues. As these discussions evolve, they may drive substantive changes in how communications and executive decisions are conducted.

In conclusion, Speaker Johnson’s revelations have not only raised questions about President Biden’s awareness but have also highlighted the foundational importance of open dialogue and effective governance. As these issues unfold, they will likely remain a focal point for both political discourse and public interest.