We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Judge Arthur Engoron Under Scrutiny for Conversation Held Before Trump's $454M Fine Imposed

 May 10, 2024

Reports indicate that a new probe is targeting a prominent New York judge after claims surfaced that he received advice before levying a substantial fine against former President Donald Trump.

A New York State judicial body is probing Judge Arthur Engoron for potentially inappropriate conduct prior to his ruling in a high-profile fraud case involving Trump, as the Daily Mail reports.

The controversy began when Adam Leitman Bailey, a notable New York City real estate attorney, admitted to speaking with Engoron weeks before the judge ordered Trump to pay a $454 million judgment in a fraud case.

This conversation is said to have occurred at the courthouse, where Bailey reportedly initiated a discussion about the case's significance.

According to Bailey, his intent was to emphasize the case's importance to New York's economy, though he asserts the advice was unsolicited and not linked to any support for Trump. Bailey, who has appeared in court before Engoron numerous times, mentioned that his interaction with Engoron was aimed at ensuring the judge understood the stakes involved.

However, Engoron's spokesperson, Al Baker, stated that the judge was "wholly uninfluenced" by Bailey and denied any ex parte communications regarding the case. Baker reassured that the judge's decision, made in February, was based solely on the merits of the case and Engoron's judicial integrity.

Investigation Follows Allegations of Unethical Judicial Conduct

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct has taken these allegations seriously and is currently investigating whether Engoron violated judicial conduct rules. These rules strictly prohibit judges from considering ex parte communications -- discussions about a case outside the presence of all involved parties -- unless it is related to advice from a disinterested expert.

Trump's legal representatives have seized upon Bailey's revelations, arguing that the judgment should be questioned if Bailey's influence is confirmed. Trump, who has criticized Engoron as "crazed" and "corrupt," had to post a $175 million bond to avoid asset seizure while he appeals the ruling.

New York Attorney General Letitia James had prepared to seize Trump's properties, including his iconic 40 Wall Street skyscraper and a Westchester golf club if he failed to secure the bond.

This action underscores the severity and immediate consequences of the judgment pending the appeal, which centers on Trump's alleged inflation of his business assets' value.

Implications For Judicial Integrity And Economic Impact

The implications of Bailey's interaction with Engoron extend beyond the legal battle into questions of judicial conduct and integrity. '

Christopher Kise, a member of Trump's defense team, pointed out that any perceived small conversation or insignificant impact does not exempt the judge from adhering to the judicial code, which demands absolute impartiality and avoidance of external influences.

While the legal proceedings continue, the public and legal community closely watch how these allegations might affect Engoron's career and the broader perceptions of judicial impartiality in high-stakes litigation.

Comprehensive Review Of Judicial And Legal Proceedings Expected

As the investigation unfolds, all parties maintain their positions staunchly. Bailey insists that his conversation with Engoron was a benign attempt to discuss the case's gravity without any explicit mention of Trump, claiming, "We weren't talking about the Mets."

Meanwhile, Engoron's team reinforces that no improper dialogue influenced the judge's decision, a stance echoed by his spokesperson who assured that the ruling was the product of thorough deliberation and legal scrutiny.

The outcome of the investigation by the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct is eagerly anticipated, as it could have significant implications for judicial standards and practices, especially in cases involving high-profile figures.

Final Reflections On Judicial Scrutiny And Legal Ethics

In conclusion, this case not only highlights the complexities of legal ethics and the expectations of judicial conduct but also underscores the significant implications of judicial decisions on political figures and state economics.

The investigation into Judge Engoron's conduct, the legal battle over Trump's alleged asset inflation, and the potential economic impact of the judgment paint a complex picture of the challenges facing judicial integrity today.