A Fulton County judge dismissed two charges against former President Donald Trump in the ongoing racketeering case tied to efforts to overturn Georgia's 2020 election results.

Judge Scott McAfee ruled that District Attorney Fani Willis lacked the authority to bring two specific charges against Trump related to allegedly false document filings in federal court, as Breitbart reports.

The dismissal narrows the scope of the case, though Trump and his co-defendants still face several other charges related to an alleged conspiracy to subvert the election outcome.

Charges Reduced in High-Profile Case

McAfee, overseeing the case in Fulton County, Georgia, ruled that state prosecutors did not have the proper jurisdiction to pursue the two charges. The charges in question stem from allegations that Trump and others falsified documents in federal court as part of their broader efforts to challenge Georgia’s election results. With this ruling, the total number of charges against Trump has been reduced from 13 to eight.

The case, which centers on alleged attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 Georgia presidential election, includes a range of co-defendants, with Trump and 14 others pleading not guilty. These charges are part of a larger RICO prosecution that seeks to demonstrate a coordinated effort to undermine the election process.

Previous Dismissals and Legal Setbacks

This is not the first time Trump has seen charges dismissed in this particular case. Earlier in March, Judge McAfee also threw out six other charges against Trump. In total, five of the original 13 charges brought against the former president have now been dismissed, reducing the scope of the prosecution's case but leaving several major charges still in play.

The remaining eight charges cover various actions allegedly taken by Trump and his co-defendants to subvert the democratic process. The legal battle continues as the prosecution focuses on these remaining charges.

DA Fani Willis Faces Scrutiny

District Attorney Fani Willis has faced numerous challenges throughout this high-profile case. In addition to the recent rulings narrowing the scope of her case against Trump, she has also been the target of efforts by Trump's legal team to remove her from the prosecution. Last month, Trump’s lawyers accused Willis of "racial animus," referencing public statements she made about ethics complaints that had been filed against her.

The accusations gained more traction when ethics complaints against Willis were found valid. The findings revealed an inappropriate relationship between Willis and prosecutor Nathan Wade, who later resigned. This development has added complexity to the case, raising questions about the impartiality of the prosecution.

Trump Frames Prosecutions as Political Attacks

As in other cases against him, Trump has framed this Georgia prosecution as a politically motivated attack. He has frequently described the charges brought against him at both state and federal levels as part of a broader conspiracy to block his return to the White House.

The former president's legal troubles, both in Georgia and elsewhere, have featured prominently in his campaign rhetoric. He continues to rally his base with claims of unfair persecution while fighting multiple cases in court.

Trump’s Legal Strategy

Despite these setbacks, Trump's legal team remains defiant. The dismissal of the two charges in this case represents a significant victory for his defense strategy. Trump's lawyers have worked tirelessly to discredit the prosecution's case, both by challenging specific charges and by attacking the credibility of the district attorney.

Trump's legal team is expected to continue fighting the remaining charges. As the case moves forward, more legal motions and challenges are likely to arise, potentially altering the course of the proceedings.

Harris Comments on Trump’s Legal Troubles

Trump's ongoing legal battles have also entered the political discourse. During the Sept. 10 presidential debate, Vice President Kamala Harris referred to the various prosecutions against Trump. Harris, now the Democratic nominee for president, highlighted the numerous legal cases Trump is facing as part of a broader critique of his candidacy and his actions in office.

Though Harris did not focus specifically on the Georgia case, her comments reflect the significant role Trump's legal challenges are expected to play in the upcoming election.

What Comes Next in the Georgia Case

The dismissal of two charges in this case marks a reprieve for Trump, but his legal journey is far from over. The remaining charges against him in Georgia still represent a serious threat, with several co-defendants facing similar allegations of attempting to interfere with the election results.

As the case progresses, both the prosecution and defense will continue to maneuver within the courts, with Trump's legal team likely to file additional motions to further weaken the case. Public interest in the trial remains high, with the potential for new revelations as the proceedings continue.

Broader Implications of the Case

This case is just one of many legal battles facing Trump, but its focus on election interference gives it particular political resonance. The outcome could have a lasting impact on future presidential campaigns, especially as Trump continues to campaign for the 2024 election.

For District Attorney Fani Willis, the case represents a significant challenge as she attempts to prosecute one of the most high-profile figures in American politics. The court’s ruling on these two charges, and the broader outcome of the trial, will likely influence her future in public office.

In the months to come, the Georgia case will remain under scrutiny, as both sides prepare for what could be a long and complex legal battle.