We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Judge Juan Merchan Flags Potential Mistrial In Trump's Hush Money Case

 June 9, 2024

A controversial Facebook post has cast doubt on the legitimacy of former President Trump's conviction on hush money charges.

Former U.S. President Trump's recent conviction is now under question due to a potential juror bias indicated by a Facebook post, Daily Mail reported.

The scrutiny began when a Facebook user, who identified as Michael Anderson, posted on a New York Unified Court System's Facebook page. This post suggested that jurors had prematurely decided Trump's guilt before the trial concluded. The content has raised significant concerns about the integrity of the jury's deliberation process.

Detailed Events Leading To Judicial Concerns

Judge Juan Merchan, overseeing the trial, acted swiftly by informing both prosecution and defense teams about the implications of this post. In a letter sent to the parties, Merchan hinted that the post could lead to a mistrial, demonstrating the gravity of the situation.

The controversial post claimed that a juror's cousin was particular about Trump's conviction, thanking others for their support in the comments. This admission, if true, could significantly impact the trial's outcome by evidencing bias in the jury.

However, the integrity of Anderson's identity and his claims remains uncertain. His profile, which described him as a 'professional s**t poster,' casts doubt on his credibility. The situation is further complicated as the profile has been deleted, and Anderson remains unreachable.

Profile Misidentification Adds To The Confusion

Adding to the confusion was a misleading photograph associated with Anderson's Facebook account, erroneously depicting punk rocker GG Allin. This misidentification has only added layers to the ongoing investigation into the matter.

The jury deliberated for nearly ten hours and consisted of seven men and five more women. Their verdict was to convict Trump on 34 counts of falsifying business records linked to payments made to Stormy Daniels. These payments were intended to silence Daniels about a past sexual encounter ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

This trial marks a historic moment as it is the first time a former U.S. President has been tried criminally. The trial's outcome is particularly significant as Trump is currently campaigning for another term in office.

Trump's Legal Team Plans Appeal

Following the verdict, Trump and his legal team have publicly denounced the conviction and declared plans to appeal. The case's prominence and implications for Trump's political future make this a highly scrutinized event.

Simultaneously, Trump's campaign investigated the juror and the origins of the Facebook post. Their findings could influence the appeal process and the public's perception of the trial's fairness.

In conclusion, the trial of former President Trump for hush money payments is now overshadowed by allegations of juror bias stemming from a social media post.

Judge Merchan's mention of a possible mistrial, the uncertain identity and intent of the Facebook user, and the impending appeal by Trump's legal team are all critical elements that continue to develop. This case's legal and political implications are profound, as they occur amidst an ongoing presidential campaign.