DON'T WAIT.

We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:

TOP STORIES

Latest News

Judge Judy Calls Out 'Nonsense' New York Criminal Case Against Trump

 June 24, 2024

TV personality Judge Judy Sheindlin has voiced strong criticism against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's prosecution of former President Donald Trump, describing it as "nonsense."

Sheindlin criticized Bragg's case during an interview with CNN's Chris Wallace, asserting it's a misuse of the justice system aimed at personal gain while urging for crime reduction efforts in Manhattan, as the Washington Examiner reports.

During her interview, Sheindlin expressed her concern about the priorities of the district attorney in New York County. She emphasized that, as a property owner in Manhattan, she would prefer that Bragg focus on addressing the city’s crime issues rather than pursuing the case against Trump.

Crime Reduction Concerns Raised

Sheindlin's remarks were specifically directed at Bragg's prosecution concerning a $130,000 payment made by Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential campaigns.

The TV star accused Bragg of using his position for self-aggrandizement and suggested that resources should be invested in fighting street and subway crime instead.

The former family court judge highlighted a recent decrease in major crimes in New York City. According to the NYPD, there was a reported 23.5% reduction in subway crime and a 25.9% reduction in shootings in March 2024 compared to the previous year. Despite these reductions, Sheindlin argued that the focus should remain on further reducing crime levels.

Sheindlin Questions Legal Merit

Sheindlin did not hold back in her critique, stating that the charges against Trump were obscure. "You had to twist yourself into a pretzel to figure out what the crime was," Sheindlin remarked.

The former judge framed the prosecution as an inefficient use of taxpayer money, suggesting that the funds could have been better spent elsewhere.

In April, a jury convicted Trump of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to the payment to Daniels. This case has drawn widespread attention and varying opinions from different political spectra.

Judge Judy's Political Stand

Sheindlin's statements about the case also shed light on her political stance. She supported Nikki Haley during the Republican primary and identifies herself as a political independent. Sheindlin has been vocal about her disapproval of Trump, stating succinctly, “I didn’t think he ever should have been president.”

Bringing her judicial experience into the conversation, Sheindlin's outlook seems rooted in her concerns for public safety and effective justice allocation. She has posited that focusing on crimes that directly affect daily life in Manhattan would be a more appropriate use of resources.

Implications for New York City

According to Sheindlin, diverting funds and energy away from key issues that impact the average citizen, such as public safety, could have adverse effects on the community. She anticipates more significant improvements in public safety if efforts are reallocated appropriately.

Her stance resonates with various Manhattan residents who share similar concerns about safety. As street and subway crimes tend to have an immediate and more noticeable impact on daily life, many align with Sheindlin's perspective on prioritizing crime reduction.

Broader National Reaction

The case against Trump has not only caused a stir locally but also taken center stage nationally. Various political analysts and public personalities have chimed in with their opinions, underscoring the ongoing divide in perception about Trump's legal battles.

Sheindlin herself has maintained a strong perspective on the effectiveness of justice, especially when it involves high-profile figures such as Trump. Seemingly unperturbed by potential backlash, Sheindlin's outspoken nature continues to resonate with a segment of the public.

Conclusion

TV judge Judy Sheindlin has criticized Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's case against Donald Trump as a misuse of the justice system, favoring a focus on reducing crime in Manhattan over pursuing the former president for what she views as convoluted charges.

Highlighting the recent decrease in crime rates, Sheindlin believes resources should bolster public safety efforts.

Her stance underscores a broader public concern about the efficient use of judicial resources and overall community welfare.