A judge has ruled that Rachel Maddow and other MSNBC hosts made "verifiably false" statements about Dr. Mahendra Amin, who was falsely accused of performing "mass hysterectomies" on detainees and is now suing for $30 million.

The Southern District of Georgia judge found that 39 "verifiably false" claims were made by MSNBC's Maddow, Chris Hayes, and others about Dr. Mahendra Amin, as the Post Millennial reports.

Amin, a physician treating detainees at a Georgia Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) center, was falsely labeled a "uterus collector" by Maddow and other MSNBC hosts. Reports aired on the network alleged that Amin performed "mass hysterectomies" on female detainees, which were medically unnecessary.

Whistleblower Allegations Spark Investigation

The case stemmed from a whistleblower complaint by a nurse at the facility, which alleged that Dr. Amin performed numerous medically unneeded hysterectomies. These claims were broadcasted by MSNBC, leading to a public outcry and significant reputational damage to Amin.

According to court documents, Amin performed only two hysterectomies, both authorized by ICE and deemed medically necessary. Additionally, both patients had signed informed consent forms.

Judge Lisa Godbey Wood's Findings

Judge Lisa Godbey Wood's ruling last month detailed the extent of the false statements made by Maddow and other hosts. She identified 39 specific claims that were verifiably false, adding weight to Dr. Amin's defamation lawsuit against NBCUniversal.

NBC published multiple reports, quoting the whistleblower nurse who referred to Amin as a "uterus collector." Despite internal concerns over the accuracy of these reports, Maddow and her colleagues continued to present these allegations on MSNBC.

Senate Probe and Legal Battle

A Senate investigation into the allegations did not substantiate claims of mass hysterectomies. The report confirmed that Dr. Amin performed just the two aforementioned hysterectomies between 2017 and 2019, both necessary and authorized by ICE.

In 2021, Dr. Amin filed a $30 million defamation lawsuit against NBCUniversal. The lawsuit was brought under Georgia law, citing the damage caused to Amin's reputation by the false statements aired by MSNBC.

MSNBC's Continued Allegations

Despite the lack of evidence supporting the whistleblower's claims, Rachel Maddow continued to quote the nurse and other sources on her show. She described the facility as an "experimental concentration camp," further damaging Dr. Amin's reputation.

Court documents revealed that the whistleblower, Dawn Wooten, had no direct knowledge of the operations and harbored a personal grudge against Amin. These details raised questions about the credibility of the initial allegations.

Internal Concerns Over Reporting

Chris Scholl, an internal network source, expressed strong concerns about the accuracy of the reporting, pointing out that Amin had a clean record. However, these concerns did not prevent Maddow and others from broadcasting the allegations.

The Southern District of Georgia judge's ruling underscored the importance of accurate reporting and the potential consequences of spreading false information. Dr. Amin's case highlights the devastating impact of defamation on an individual's professional and personal life.

Next Steps in the Defamation Case

As the legal battle continues, a trial date for Dr. Amin's defamation case has not yet been set.

The outcome of this case could have significant implications for media accountability and the responsibilities of journalists in reporting sensitive information.

Conclusion of the Defamation Case

In summary, a judge has ruled that Rachel Maddow and other MSNBC hosts made "verifiably false" statements about Dr. Mahendra Amin in a defamation case involving a $30 million lawsuit.

Amin was falsely accused of performing "mass hysterectomies" on detainees, a claim disproven by court documents and a Senate probe.

Despite internal concerns and lack of evidence, MSNBC continued to broadcast these damaging allegations. The legal proceedings are ongoing, with a trial date yet to be determined.