We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Justice Alito Labeled Insurrectionist Sympathizer by House Leader Amid Flag Controversy

 June 15, 2024

In a striking comment to Fox News, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries labeled Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito an "insurrectionist sympathizer."

The allegations from Jeffries emerged amidst a controversy over a decision by the Supreme Court justice's wife to display the "Appeal to Heaven" flag, a symbol linked by some to the Capitol protests of Jan. 6, 2021, as Fox News reports.

Jeffries, a Democrat from New York, spoke on Friday, strongly criticizing both Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas. His comments have sparked a heated debate.

The "Appeal to Heaven" flag, originally used by Continental Army ships during the American Revolution, has become controversial in recent years. It has been associated -- by some -- to the Jan. 6 Capitol unrest, giving rise to the current uproar.

Alito Defends Flag Display

In response to the criticism, Alito defended the display of the flag, attributing his wife's decision to a neighbor's provocative "F--- Trump" sign near a school bus stop. He explained that his wife's action was not an endorsement of any particular group.

"Martha-Ann did not fly it to associate herself with that or any other group and the use of an old historic flag by a new group does not necessarily drain that flag of all other meanings," Alito stated in his letter.

However, the association of the flag with the insurrection has made the response more contentious. Alito's defense also emphasized the flag's historical context, attempting to dissociate it from its more recent connotations.

Jeffries Criticizes Conservative Justices

Further intensifying his attack, Jeffries condemned the Supreme Court's right-leaning justices. He mentioned that the American public largely perceives them as being "out of control."

Jeffries's comments align with growing tensions around the Supreme Court and its decisions, reflecting a broader political battle over the judiciary's integrity and independence.

Calls For Recusal from Key Cases

The Alito flag displays to Democratic Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse and Dick Durbin demanding that Alito recuse himself from participation in Trump v. United States and other Jan. 6-related cases.

They argued that the display of the flag at Alito's properties compromised his impartiality.

In a letter, Alito firmly rejected the recusal request, asserting that there is no justified reason for him to withdraw from the mentioned cases.

"A reasonable person who is not motivated by political or ideological considerations or a desire to affect Supreme Court cases would conclude that this event does not meet the applicable standard for recusal," Alito stated. Hence, he felt it was his duty to reject the request.

Political Climate Heats Up

Jeffries expressed that actions like these are why Democrats have seen successes and have been "overperforming" since the fall of 2022. His comments come at a time when political rhetoric is increasingly charged, and partisan divides are stark.

The clash over the flag symbol and the justices' roles in politically sensitive cases mirrors broader clashes over the direction of U.S. politics.

Amid the furor, Jeffries remains steadfast in his position, suggesting that the controversies involving right-wing justices will continue to shape the political and judicial landscape.


House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries's recent statements reflect significant tensions in American politics and the judiciary. By calling Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito an "insurrectionist sympathizer," Jeffries has both highlighted and escalated the controversy over Alito's wife's display of the "Appeal to Heaven" flag.

The flag’s links to the Jan. 6 Capitol protests have garnered significant criticism from Jeffries and others, while Alito defends its historical significance and his wife’s motivations.

Meanwhile, the calls for Justice Alito to recuse himself from key cases represent a broader conflict over judicial impartiality. This controversy exemplifies ongoing disputes and underscores the deepening divides within American society.