Former Vice President Kamala Harris has boldly crowned herself a "historic figure" in a recent interview, referencing an expected marble bust of her likeness soon to grace the halls of Congress, as Fox News reports.

In a nutshell, Harris’s latest remarks and upcoming book, 107 Days, have stirred the pot with self-proclaimed historical significance, a sold-out book tour, and sharp critiques of fellow Democrats like Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and former President Joe Biden.

During a sit-down with the New York Times on Tuesday, Harris didn’t hold back on her legacy talk. She pointed to a longstanding Senate tradition dating back to the late 1800s, where vice presidents are honored with marble busts. It’s a factual nod to history, but her confidence in joining those ranks raises eyebrows among those wary of self-aggrandizement.

Harris Touts 'Historic' Legacy

"I understand the focus on '28 and all that," she told the Times, "but there will be a marble bust of me in Congress." Is this a humble reflection or a premature victory lap? For conservatives skeptical of progressive self-importance, it leans toward the latter, though one can’t deny her role as a former VP earns her a spot in the historical ledger.

Harris also claimed she’s shed the weight of needing to carve out her place in history. That’s a fair personal sentiment, but when paired with marble bust predictions, it feels more like a press release than introspection.

Turning to her book tour for 107 Days, Harris boasted of massive crowds and sold-out venues. "Thousands of people are coming to hear my voice," she declared to the Times. While enthusiasm for a political figure isn’t new, the emphasis on numbers feels like a campaign pitch rather than a literary triumph.

Book Tour Success or Campaign Echo?

Inside the pages of 107 Days, Harris doesn’t shy away from throwing punches at her own party. She takes aim at Biden’s White House, alleging they sidelined her and failed to offer support during their shared term. It’s a bold accusation, though some might argue it’s convenient timing to air grievances in print.

Then there’s her clash with Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, whom she passed over as a running mate in favor of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz -- a decision that surprised many political watchers. Harris paints Shapiro as overstepping, even quoting herself reminding him that "a vice president is not a co-president." It’s a spicy jab, but does it reveal more about her leadership style than his ambition?

In her book, Harris details Shapiro pestering her staff with questions, including how to get Pennsylvania artists’ work on loan from the Smithsonian. It’s a peculiar anecdote -- perhaps meant to show micromanaging -- but it risks coming off as petty in a public memoir. For those tired of political score-settling, this might feel like unnecessary drama.

Shapiro Fires Back at Harris’s Claims

Shapiro, for his part, didn’t take the critique lying down. "She wrote that in her book? That’s complete and utter bull----," he fired off in an interview with the Atlantic. His raw frustration is palpable, and for conservatives who value straight talk over polished narratives, it’s a point in his favor.

He admitted to asking plenty of questions but framed it as due diligence for a potential partnership. One has to wonder if Harris’s portrayal is more about selling a story than reflecting reality. After all, asking questions isn’t a crime, even in politics.

Shapiro also accused Harris of using the book to boost sales, initially saying she’s trying to "cover her a--," before quickly retracting the phrase as inappropriate. It’s a rare moment of self-correction in a heated exchange, and while his skepticism about her motives resonates with those distrustful of political memoirs, the backtrack shows a flicker of restraint.

Democrats' Infighting Under the Spotlight

This public spat between Harris and Shapiro only deepens the perception of Democratic Party disunity, a theme conservatives often highlight when critiquing the left’s cohesion. While internal disagreements aren’t unique to any party, airing them in a book feels like a risky move for someone still in the political spotlight.

Harris’s broader narrative in 107 Days seems to position her as both victim and victor—sidelined by Biden yet destined for marble immortality. For those skeptical of progressive agendas, this duality might come across as calculated rather than candid, though her perspective as a former VP undeniably carries weight.

At the end of the day, Harris’s self-described historic status and the ensuing drama with Shapiro offer a glimpse into the messy underbelly of political ambition. Whether her marble bust becomes reality or her book just another footnote, this saga reminds us that in politics, legacy is often a battlefield of perception over substance. For conservatives, it’s a cautionary tale about the dangers of prioritizing image over unity.