In a revealing "exit interview," former Colorado Rep. Ken Buck has delved into the dysfunction and covert operations plaguing Congress.

Buck's decision to not seek reelection in 2024 stemmed from profound disagreements with his party's stance on the events of Jan. 6, highlighting a growing discord, as the Washington Examiner reports.

Challenges and Revelations from Ken Buck's Congressional Journey

Upon announcing his departure, Buck expressed a deep sense of honor in having represented his district. However, his tenure was not without its struggles, particularly with the inefficacies of the 118th Congress, bogged down by internal conflicts within the party.

Buck pointed to the overwhelming influence of Big Tech and substantial financial interests in Congress, which he believes severely impedes legislative progress, especially in areas like antitrust laws.

Monetary Influence and Committee Assignments in Congress

One of the more shocking revelations from Buck was the financial obligations tied to securing influential committee assignments.

He was informed that raising substantial amounts of money was necessary to be considered for these positions, a practice unknown to many Americans.

"Buying a committee seat is not something most Americans know that members of Congress have to do," Buck disclosed, highlighting the opaque practices within the institution.

The Personal and Financial Struggles of Serving in Congress

Despite an annual salary of $174,000, Buck discussed the financial burden of maintaining dual residences and vehicles in both Washington, D.C., and his home district. This situation posed a stark contrast to the earnings of his constituents, where the average salary can be as low as $32,000 in some areas.

The sustainability of Social Security and Medicare was another major concern for Buck, who predicted imminent bankruptcy for these programs without significant reform.

Proposals for Reforming Congressional Incentives

Buck suggested drastic changes to the incentive structure within Congress to encourage fiscal responsibility.

He proposed that members should not receive salaries unless a balanced budget is passed, and also recommended restrictions on reelection for those who do not reduce spending.

"We can’t sustain $34 trillion of debt. Right now, the incentive is to spend all the money that we don’t have and put the burden on our grandchildren," he stated, emphasizing the lack of spending discipline in current congressional practices.

Reflecting on a Less Divisive Past in Congress

Buck reminisced about times during the 1970s and 1980s when Congressional members resided in Washington with their families, which fostered less divisiveness and more cooperative relationships.

He attributed some of the current dysfunction to the shift away from this model, as members now prioritize returning to their districts.

"There was less divisiveness. There was less hate," Buck commented, suggesting that the previous arrangement allowed for a more harmonious working environment.

Conclusion: Ken Buck's Candid Reflections and Warnings

In summary, Ken Buck’s candid reflections expose significant challenges within Congress, from the influence of money on legislative actions to the personal sacrifices required of its members.

His call for reforming congressional incentives to foster financial discipline reflects a dire need for structural changes to preserve the integrity of this pivotal institution.

As Buck steps away, his insights serve as a caution for the future, urging a return to practices that promote unity and sustainability.