BBC to apologize to Trump over edited 'Panorama' footage
Hold onto your hats, folks -- the BBC, a bastion of British broadcasting for decades, is gearing up to issue a rare apology to none other than Donald Trump over a scandal involving a doctored video clip, as the Daily Mail reports.
The controversy centers on a Panorama episode aired in October 2024 that deceptively edited a speech delivered by Trump amid the U.S. Capitol unrest, prompting fierce criticism from the White House for spreading what officials there called utter falsehoods, alongside demands for accountability from Parliament’s Culture, Media and Sport Committee.
This mess started brewing in the summer of 2024 when Michael Prescott, a former external adviser to the BBC’s editorial standards committee, flagged serious issues with how Trump’s words were cut and pasted.
BBC's Editorial Misstep Sparks Outrage
Prescott didn’t mince words, alleging the clip was twisted to paint Trump as inciting violence on January 6, conveniently leaving out his call for supporters to act “peacefully and patriotically.”
Fast forward to October, when the episode aired, and the White House hit back hard, with Trump’s press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, slamming the edit as a deliberate distortion.
Leavitt didn’t hold back, declaring, “This purposefully and dishonestly edited clip by the BBC is further evidence that they are total, 100 per cent fake news that should no longer be worth the time on the television screens of the great people of the United Kingdom.” Well, if that’s not a mic drop, what is?
Parliament Demands Answers from BBC
Since the issue broke, thanks to reporting by the Telegraph, the Culture, Media and Sport Committee has been on the BBC’s case, pressing chairman Samir Shah for explanations.
The Committee, led by Dame Caroline Dinenage, isn’t just asking for a polite “sorry” -- they want concrete steps to prevent such editorial blunders from eroding public trust.
Dame Caroline herself put it sharply: “The BBC clearly has serious questions to answer regarding both its editorial standards and the way in which concerns are handled by senior management.” She’s right to demand accountability -- when a publicly funded outlet plays fast and loose with the facts, it’s not just a slip-up; it’s a betrayal of its core mission.
Apology on the Horizon
Word is, Shah will pen an apology early next week, directed to Dame Caroline, while a full response to the Committee is slated for Monday, according to a BBC spokesperson.
Downing Street also got wind of Prescott’s memo, with Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy and senior officials assured that the BBC would dig into the matter. Let’s hope that investigation isn’t just a box-ticking exercise.
This fiasco couldn’t have come at a worse time for the BBC, already under fire for unrelated issues like complaints over presenter Gary Lineker’s social media antics and accusations of slant in their Israel-Gaza reporting.
Broader Scrutiny on BBC Standards
The broadcaster is facing a perfect storm of criticism, with growing calls to tighten editorial guidelines and prove they’re not swayed by any particular agenda. One can’t help but wonder if the BBC has lost sight of its duty to report rather than reshape the narrative.
Even within the BBC, voices like Today presenter Nick Robinson acknowledge the heat, admitting on-air that there’s “a genuine concern about editorial standards and mistakes at the corporation.” Yet, he quickly pivoted to claim there’s also a political campaign against the BBC -- perhaps a convenient shield when the spotlight gets too bright?
While Robinson and supporters like veteran journalist John Simpson may see this as a witch hunt, the reality is that public trust isn’t a given -- it’s earned. When edits distort the truth, as Prescott warned, it’s not just a mistake; it’s a crack in the foundation of credibility that the BBC must urgently repair.





