We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

Letitia James Seeks Extension In Trump Appointee's Court

 May 7, 2024

New York's Legal Battle Crosses Into Texas as Attorney General Letitia James Requests More Time.

New York Attorney General Letitia James seeks additional time in Texas to negotiate a resolution over a business fraud case involving former CFO Ariel Schachter, Newsweek reported.

In 2016, New York's then-Attorney General Eric Schneiderman initiated legal proceedings against Northern Leasing Systems. Ariel Schachter, the company's CFO at the time, was prohibited from leasing operations in New York after a fraud judgment in 2020.

Legal Battles Extend Beyond New York Borders

Schachter aims to start a leasing business in Texas and challenges the enforceability of the New York judgment in his current state. He argues the prior ruling lacked proper evidence and testimony on his part.

Attorney General Letitia James requested a 45-day extension to respond to Schachter's lawsuit. The request went to Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, known for his conservative judicial approach and recent nationally noted rulings.

Judge Kacsmaryk's Influence in Federal Court

In April 2023, Judge Kacsmaryk ordered the FDA to revoke approval of mifepristone, a decision later scrutinized by the U.S. Supreme Court, showcasing the controversial nature of his rulings.

James' office requested an extension, indicating ongoing negotiations for a potential resolution. Court filings suggest that if a mutual agreement is reached, the litigation might be dismissed.

Strategic Legal Negotiations Underway

James' office suggests a potential resolution without further litigation, indicating openness to settle disputes out of court and avoid escalation.

Ongoing talks between the parties are elaborated upon: "Counsel for the parties discuss a potential resolution. Defendant requests a 45-day extension to continue discussions and potentially reach a resolution, leading to dismissal of the litigation."

Challenges of Cross-State Legal Enforcement

Schachter's legal challenge is based on the claim that the expedited proceedings under New York law, which were used to obtain the judgment against him, should not be enforceable in Texas. He argues that the specific state laws favoring such swift judgments are not applicable outside New York.

However, this legal predicament showcases the complex interplay between state laws and how they are recognized across state lines, particularly in business and fraud cases.

Schachter’s push for a new start in Texas is hindered by past legal decisions in New York, illustrating the long shadow that prior judgments can cast over one’s professional pursuits.

Future Legal Pathways for Schachter and James

If negotiations fail, James’ office has prepared to proceed with further legal motions. However, this potential development could lead to more intense legal scrutiny and possibly, a prolonged court battle. Consequently, the outcomes of such proceedings could have significant implications for both parties involved.

As the case continues to develop, all eyes are on how these negotiations will shape the future legal landscape for Schachter and the enforcement of New York's judicial decisions in other jurisdictions.

Conclusion: Ongoing Negotiations Could Set Legal Precedents

In conclusion, the dispute between New York Attorney General Letitia James and former CFO Ariel Schachter spans complex legal frameworks involving fraud judgments and their enforceability across state lines.

Moreover, as discussions continue, the potential resolution without further court interventions remains a pivotal aspect of this case. Consequently, the legal community closely watches the outcome, which could influence future cross-state legal practices and business operations.