Crime experts are increasingly convinced that Luigi Mangione, charged with the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, did not act alone in the Dec. 4 incident in New York City.

In a shocking twist, evidence and expert analysis suggest that Mangione, charged with murder, might have had help in the killing, as the Daily Mail reports.

Mangione, a 26-year-old Ivy League graduate, has found himself at the center of a high-profile murder case following the death of Thompson.

Charged with murder and an additional count of terrorism, Mangione was recently extradited back to New York from Pennsylvania, where he was caught.

Expert: Crime Scene Analysis Points to Accomplice

Surveillance footage and expert testimony have raised questions about Mangione's claim of sole responsibility. Brian O'Shea, a private intelligence expert and former U.S. Army officer, expressed doubts about Mangione's ability to track Thompson's movements without assistance.

O'Shea highlighted the improbability of coinciding with the victim's schedule so precisely without help. "The odds of you getting somewhere right when your mark is getting there are next to impossible without a team," O'Shea explained.

Further investigations revealed that Mangione was seen on CCTV talking on the phone moments before the incident, suggesting coordination with another party.

Discrepancies in Surveillance Footage

Experts noted discrepancies in the timing and movements captured on different cameras around the murder scene.

These inconsistencies, along with Mangione's early arrival in New York on Nov. 24, a week before the announcement of a significant UnitedHealthcare conference, suggest premeditated planning and possible inside information.

O'Shea speculated on methods of surveillance possibly employed, including the bribing of building staff. "If it were me doing surveillance of this sort, I'd be paying off a door guard or concierge," he said.

An anonymous security expert discussed the logistics of public figure attacks, noting the use of a staging location, which could implicate more individuals in the planning phase.

Manifesto and Public Witness Accounts

A manifesto attributed to Mangione claimed he acted alone, but this has been met with skepticism by authorities and experts.

"To save you a lengthy investigation, I state plainly that I wasn't working with anyone," the manifesto read, as reported by journalist Ken Klippenstein.

Witnesses near the crime scene also reported seeing Mangione loitering on a street corner for an extended period. "This guy, he was here on the corner all night. The guy who shot the guy. He was standing here on this corner," a witness told Fox News.

Further analysis by O'Shea on the use of common surveillance techniques, such as marking a target with brake light signals, adds another layer of complexity to the investigation. "The way we would mark the target is by stepping on the brake lights in a situation like this," he described.

Investigation Continues Amidst New Findings

The ongoing investigation into Mangione's actions and possible accomplices continues to unravel new layers of complexity. CCTV timestamp discrepancies, pointed out by O'Shea, could be crucial in reconstructing the timeline of events. "If someone handed that over and says, 'Hey, by the way, this one, we never set it back from daylight savings time,' you'd need that in an affidavit," he noted about the importance of accurate timestamps in legal proceedings.

As investigators piece together the evidence and analyze the potential for additional suspects, the case against Mangione remains under intense scrutiny. With his return to New York pending, the legal battle and the search for truth promise to garner significant public and media attention.

While Mangione maintains his innocence regarding collaborative involvement, the accumulation of evidence and expert insights suggest the murder of Brian Thompson might not have been the act of a lone assailant. As the case evolves, the implications of these findings could be profound for all involved.