Megyn Kelly Predicts Challenges Ahead for the US if Harris Secures Win
Megyn Kelly has painted a bleak picture of the future of America, depending on the outcome of the November presidential election.
In a recent interview, Kelly shared her concerns about a potential Kamala Harris presidency, contrasting it with her views on a possible Donald Trump administration, as the Daily Mail reports.
The broadcaster, known for her forthright opinions, emphasized that no matter the election's outcome on Tuesday, Nov. 5, the nation is likely to experience tumultuous times.
Kelly has expressed her lack of faith in Harris's handling of key national issues. Foremost among her concerns is the illegal immigration challenge.
She attributed the crisis to Harris's inaction, claiming the vice president has shown no intention of addressing it effectively. According to Kelly, Harris has failed to exhibit even the minimal pretense of combating illegal immigration, particularly pertaining to criminal elements such as gang members from Venezuela.
Concerns Over Transgender Policies and Economic Plans
Another area of apprehension for Kelly is Harris's stance on transgender rights. She warns of what she describes as a high escalation in these policies, potentially leading to taxpayer-funded gender transition procedures for inmates.
Economic matters also feature prominently in Kelly's critique. She predicts that under Harris’s leadership, the economy could stall, and taxes may rise.
She articulated concerns over Harris's lack of concrete strategies to tackle the ongoing inflation crisis, which she sees as exacerbating the economic challenges the country faces.
Divergent Predictions for Trump's Actions
In addressing the possibility of Trump's loss, Kelly anticipates that his reaction would differ from 2020. While she expects him to handle a defeat more gracefully, she doubts he will openly accept the results without attempting to cast doubts on their legitimacy.
Conversely, should Trump secure victory, Kelly forecasts strong defensive maneuvering from Democrats. She suspects they may resort to legal tactics in an attempt to prevent his inauguration.
This would include labeling him Trump an "insurrectionist," potentially ushering in new legal battles reminiscent of previous attempts to challenge his presidency.
Potential Democratic Resistance and Media Criticism
Kelly further predicts possible Democratic Party efforts to impeach Trump for a third time within the initial month of his prospective second term. If their primary efforts falter, she envisions the Democrats persisting in their tactics, leveraging investigations as tools to challenge his administration.
On the subject of media portrayals, Kelly takes issue with extreme comparisons made of Trump to notorious figures like Hitler, Dahmer, and Manson. She characterizes these comparisons as sensationalist media strategies, aimed at amplifying negative perceptions of the former president.
Allegations Against Kamala Harris's Husband
Turning to allegations involving Doug Emhoff, Harris's husband, Kelly criticized the media, particularly those with left-leaning tendencies, for purportedly ignoring accusations against him.
Emhoff faces claims of infidelity during his first marriage and is accused of slapping an ex-girlfriend, which he has attempted to downplay.
Kelly commended the Daily Mail for its coverage of these issues, contrasting it with what she perceives as a broader media silence.
Views on Trump's Potential Appointees
In contemplating a future Trump administration, Kelly is hopeful about the infusion of new talent into the federal government. She points to figures such as Vivek Ramaswamy and Tulsi Gabbard as promising additions. Moreover, she speculates about Elon Musk joining Trump's team, which she believes could enhance government efficiency.
As the election approaches, Kelly plans to discuss these and other topics with a panel on her show. Contributors will include Maureen Callahan and conservative figures like Ben Shapiro. With so much at stake, the upcoming broadcast promises a compelling examination of the election’s possible implications for the U.S.