We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

NY Judge Rejects Trump's Plea to Postpone Hush Money Trial

By Matthias Dathan
April 4, 2024

In a notable decision from Manhattan, Judge Juan Merchan dismissed former President Donald Trump's request for a trial delay over hush money allegations, setting the stage for legal proceedings to commence on April 15.

Judge Merchan's ruling keeps Trump's trial on schedule amid debates over his presidential immunity claims, as Mediaite reports.

The legal motion to delay the trial until the Supreme Court could decide on Trump's presidential immunity was overturned on Wednesday, as per the court documents.

This decision retains the trial's established schedule, currently slated to begin mid-April, spotlighting the judicial system's refusal to stall proceedings based on Trump's legal arguments.

Trump Faces Multiple Felony Counts in Upcoming Trial

Judge Merchan, in his written decision, emphasized the untimeliness of Trump's immunity claim. The ruling highlighted that Trump had numerous opportunities to present his presidential immunity argument well before March 7, 2024, yet chose to delay.

This stance by the court underscores the judiciary's perspective on the timing and relevance of legal defenses in high-profile cases.

Trump's defense has been vocal about his supposed absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken within his official presidential duties.

This legal theory was central to his team's request in March to postpone the trial, pending a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the matter. However, Merchan's decision signals a critical setback for Trump, emphasizing the court's expectation for timely legal arguments.

A Critical Moment in Presidential Immunity Debate

The Supreme Court's scheduled hearing on April 25 for Trump's immunity claim adds another layer of complexity to this unfolding legal drama.

This comes as Trump faces 34 felony charges of falsifying business records in connection to alleged hush money payments made in 2016. Trump has steadfastly pleaded not guilty to all charges, maintaining his innocence amidst swirling allegations.

This trial in New York marks the first among four criminal cases against Trump to reach trial phase, potentially becoming the only case to conclude before the 2024 presidential elections. The charges, centered around falsified business records to allegedly conceal hush money payments, paint a challenging legal battle for the former president.

Legal Strategies and Public Speculation Swirl

Despite the indictment being labeled as the weakest against Trump, the stakes remain high. Public and legal scrutiny intensifies as Trump navigates through these allegations while eyeing a potential run in the 2024 presidential race. The case's progression without delay highlights the judiciary's commitment to moving forward, despite Trump's legal maneuvers.

Axios' request for comment from Trump's representatives following the Wednesday decision went unanswered, leaving the public and media to speculate on the defense team's next steps. This silence adds an element of uncertainty to the already complex legal proceedings.

The Road Ahead: Trials and Presidential Ambitions

The denial of Trump's request sets a definitive path towards the trial, challenging his legal team's strategies and potentially impacting his public image and political ambitions. As the trial date approaches, all eyes will be on how this case unfolds and its implications for Trump's claims of presidential immunity.

In conclusion, the denial of Trump's motion to delay the hush money trial maintains the April 15 start date, challenging his presidential immunity claims.

Judge Merchan's decision, citing untimeliness, and the upcoming Supreme Court hearing add layers of legal complexity to this high-profile case.

With Trump facing 34 felony counts and pleading not guilty, the outcome of this trial could have significant implications for his future political endeavors and the legal landscape surrounding presidential immunity.