A recent GOP-led House Judiciary Committee report has sparked controversy over the legal proceedings against former President Donald Trump.

The House report argues that the trial and prosecution of Trump by Manhattan's DA and a judge were fundamentally flawed and unconstitutional, Just the News reported.

On Tuesday, the House Judiciary Committee and its Weaponization Subcommittee released a detailed report criticizing the prosecution approach taken by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and the trial overseen by Judge Juan Merchan.

Specifically, the committees allege that the theories and procedures used in the trial violated constitutional standards, mainly focusing on due process rights.

Meanwhile, Trump, who faced legal battles, was charged in April 2023 and subsequently found guilty on multiple felony counts related to financial misdeeds in May 2023.

Report Highlights Unconventional Legal Approaches

The report pointed out severe issues with the legal theories adopted during the trial; particularly, it highlighted how misdemeanor charges escalated to felonies. It criticized the need for more clarity in identifying the specific underlying crimes.

Moreover, according to the report, Trump needed adequate notice of the charges against him, compromising his ability to mount a defense. This lack of clarity directly impacted the fairness of the proceedings and the defense's strategy.

Judge's Instructions Questioned by Judiciary Committee

Judge Merchan's instructions to the jury were also a point of contention. The report claims that he advised jurors that they did not need to agree on which specific acts were unlawful to reach a conviction, providing them with multiple potential unlawful acts to consider.

Furthermore, according to the report, this approach contradicts precedents set by the Supreme Court concerning due process.

Moreover, the committee expressed concerns that such instructions could mislead jurors, potentially leading to a biased verdict.

Trump's Conviction and Vow to Appeal

Following his conviction, Trump was vocal about his intentions to challenge the verdict. He labeled the trial a scam and harshly criticized Judge Merchan's conduct.

"We're going to be appealing this scam," Trump stated. "The judge was a tyrant... We're going to fight," he continued, signaling his resolve to overturn the conviction.

Moreover, his statement highlighted his ongoing commitment to "Make America Great Again," a slogan central to his political identity.

Committee's Call for Action

The report concludes with a solid call to the New York appellate courts to review and potentially reverse the conviction.

"The testimony that the Committee and Select Subcommittee have received makes clear that President Trump's trial was riddled with constitutional defects – defects that should prompt the New York appellate courts to reverse the verdict," the report detailed.

It emphasized that the trial violated "basic principles of due process," questioning the overall integrity of the legal proceedings.

In conclusion, the GOP-led House Judiciary Committee's report poses significant questions about the legality and fairness of Donald Trump's trial. It argues against the novel legal theories used, the conduct of the trial, and the instructions given to jurors, suggesting these factors together justify overturning the conviction.

The unfolding legal battles continue to draw attention as Trump vows to fight the verdict and reclaim his position in American politics.