We publish the objective news, period. If you want the facts, then sign up below and join our movement for objective news:


Latest News

OK Supreme Court Rejects Reparations Lawsuit by Tulsa Massacre Survivors

 June 13, 2024

The Oklahoma Supreme Court has dismissed a lawsuit filed by survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre, a decision that has deeply disappointed advocates for racial justice and financial reparations.

The court's ruling upheld a district court's previous decision, concluding that the plaintiffs' grievances did not fall under the state’s public nuisance statute, as the Associated Press reports.

Supreme Court Dismisses Reparations Lawsuit

On Wednesday, the Oklahoma Supreme Court made a pivotal decision to dismiss the lawsuit brought forth by the last remaining survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre. The massacre, which left as many as 300 people dead and decimated a thriving Black district, has long been a poignant symbol of racial violence in America.

The nine-member court upheld the decision of a district court judge in Tulsa from the previous year. The initial ruling had determined that the grievances related to the destruction of the Greenwood district did not fit within the parameters of the state’s public nuisance law.

The court specifically noted that there was no evidence of physical damage to property in Greenwood that could be addressed through an injunction or other civil remedy. This crucial detail significantly influenced the court's decision to dismiss the case.

Details of the Court's Ruling

In its ruling, the Oklahoma Supreme Court stated, “Plaintiffs do not point to any physical injury to property in Greenwood rendering it uninhabitable that could be resolved by way of injunction or other civil remedy.” This statement underscored the court's reasoning that the grievances did not meet the legal criteria necessary for relief under the public nuisance statute.

The court further emphasized its stance by stating, “Today we hold that relief is not possible under any set of facts that could be established consistent with plaintiff’s allegations.” This definitive language left little room for reinterpretation or future litigation on similar grounds.

Messages left with Damario Solomon-Simmons, the attorney representing the survivors, were not immediately returned. This lack of response left the public without additional commentary from the plaintiffs' legal team immediately following the court's decision.

Historical Context and Significance

The Tulsa Race Massacre of 1921 is a historical event that significantly impacted the African American community in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Occurring over a span of two days, the massacre resulted in the deaths of an estimated 300 people and the destruction of the Greenwood district, an area that was renowned for its prosperous Black-owned businesses and vibrant community life.

The Greenwood district, often referred to as "Black Wall Street," was a beacon of African American economic success and cultural achievement in the early 20th century. The massacre not only resulted in a tragic loss of life but also led to the displacement of many residents and the obliteration of a thriving community.

In recent years, there has been a renewed focus on the events of 1921, with survivors and their descendants seeking justice and reparations for the losses incurred. The lawsuit dismissed by the Oklahoma Supreme Court was part of a broader movement aimed at securing financial compensation and acknowledging the historical injustices faced by the Black community in Tulsa.

Advocates for Racial Justice React

The court’s decision has been met with disappointment and frustration by advocates for racial justice. They argue that the dismissal of the lawsuit represents a missed opportunity to address historical wrongs and provide financial reparations to those who suffered as a result of the massacre.

Advocates have pointed out that the destruction of the Greenwood district had long-lasting economic and social impacts on the Black community in Tulsa. They believe that reparations could play a critical role in rectifying these historical injustices and fostering healing and reconciliation.

Despite the setback, supporters of reparations for the survivors of the Tulsa Race Massacre remain determined. They are exploring other legal avenues and strategies to achieve justice and compensation for the survivors and their descendants.

Future Legal and Social Implications

The dismissal of the lawsuit by the Oklahoma Supreme Court may set a precedent for similar cases in the future. Legal experts are analyzing the court's rationale and its implications for other efforts to seek reparations for historical injustices.

There is a growing movement across the United States to address the legacies of racial violence and discrimination through legal and policy measures. The outcome of this case could influence how courts and lawmakers approach these issues moving forward.

Advocates for racial justice are calling for a comprehensive approach to addressing historical injustices. They argue that beyond legal remedies, there is a need for public acknowledgment, education, and policy reforms to fully address the impact of events like the Tulsa Race Massacre.


The Oklahoma Supreme Court’s decision to dismiss the reparations lawsuit by survivors of the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre marks a significant moment in the ongoing struggle for racial justice.

While the court upheld the previous ruling that the plaintiffs' grievances did not meet the criteria of the state's public nuisance statute, the pursuit of justice for the survivors and their descendants continues.

Advocates remain committed to seeking alternative legal avenues and broader societal recognition of the historical injustices that have long affected the Black community in Tulsa.