The Biden-Harris administration revoked a plea deal with three of the 9/11 terrorists, sparking national outrage and launching an investigation.

The plea deal, which had removed the possibility of the death penalty, was revoked by Joe Biden's Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III, a scenario that has prompted an inquiry by the House Armed Services Committee, as Fox News reports.

Pentagon prosecutors initially agreed to a plea deal with a trio of terrorists behind the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. This agreement took the death penalty off the table for Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin 'Attash, and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi.

On Friday, Austin announced the revocation of this plea deal. In a related move, Austin also relieved the official in charge of the military commission who signed the original agreements.

Memo Sparks Controversy Over Revoked Deal

The revocation was officially communicated through a memo dated July 31, 2024. No specific reasons were provided for the sudden withdrawal of the agreements that had been signed and announced.

Chairman Mike Rogers of the House Armed Services Committee immediately launched an investigation into the plea deals. Rogers condemned the agreements as a "gut punch" to the families of victims who perished in the 9/11 attacks, which resulted in nearly 3,000 deaths.

Reaction from the White House was swift, with a National Security Council spokesperson insisting that President Joe Biden had no involvement in the plea deals. The spokesperson stated that the White House learned of the agreements only after they had been announced.

Victims' Families React to Revoked Plea Deal

White House national security spokesman John Kirby affirmed that the administration was unaware of the deals until their public announcement. The statement aimed to distance the President and his administration from the controversial agreements.

Victims' groups expressed mixed feelings. Patrick Hendry, president of the Police Benevolent Association of the City of New York, praised the families' efforts in reversing the plea deals. Hendry stressed the need for the terrorists to face the ultimate punishment.

Meanwhile, Brett Eagleson, president of 9/11 Justice, voiced frustration over the lack of consultation with victims' families before the plea deals were made and subsequently revoked.

Eagleson emphasized the importance of terrorists divulging all information they possess regarding the attacks.

Call For Greater Accountability and Transparency

Eagleson stressed that uncovering the full truth, including potential involvement of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, is critical. He asserted that the nearly 3,000 victims and their families deserve complete transparency and accountability.

The comments by Eagleson highlighted the ongoing quest for truth and justice. He underscored the need to hold responsible parties accountable for the tragic events of 9/11, ensuring no stone is left unturned.

Following the revocation of the plea deals, it remains to be seen how the Biden-Harris administration will address the complex issues surrounding the 9/11 trials and victims' quest for justice.

Conclusion

In summary, the sudden revocation of the plea deals with three 9/11 terrorists has ignited national outrage and prompted an investigation by the House Armed Services Committee.

The decision, made by Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III, removed previously agreed terms that had taken the death penalty off the table. While the White House has distanced itself from the plea deals, the move has received mixed reactions from victims' families and advocacy groups.

They emphasize the importance of the terrorists facing the highest possible punishment and revealing all details regarding the 9/11 attacks, including any potential involvement by Saudi Arabia.

As the nation continues to seek justice and accountability, the revocation of these plea deals calls for greater transparency in the pursuit of truth.